The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly’s nervous system
Open accessAbstract
The computations performed by individual movement detectors are analyzed by intracellularly recording from an identified direction-selective motion-sensitive interneuron in the fly's brain and by comparing these results with model predictions based on movement detectors of the correlation type. Three main conclusions were drawn with respect to the movement-detection system of the fly: (1) The essential nonlinear interaction between the two movement-detector input channels can be characterized formally by a mathematically almost perfect multiplication process. (2) Even at high contrasts no significant nonlinearities seem to distort the time course of the movement-detector input signals. (3) The movement detectors of the fly are not perfectly antisymmetrical; i.e., they respond with different time courses and amplitudes to motion in their preferred and null directions. As a consequence of this property, the motion detectors can respond to some degree to stationary patterns whose brightness is modulated in time. Moreover, the direction selectivity, i.e., the relative difference of the responses to motion in the preferred and null directions, depends on the contrast and on the spatial-frequency content of the stimulus pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488 · Cited by 890
Schiller, P. H., Finlay, B. L., & Volman, S. F. (1976) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1288 · Cited by 458
Cited by
Borst, A., Haag, J., & Reiff, D. F. (2010) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153155 · Cited by 342
Self-citationSeeing Things in Motion: Models, Circuits, and Mechanisms
Borst, A., & Euler, T. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.031 · Cited by 281
Self-citationComputational neuroscience: a comprehensive approach
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-5284 · Cited by 279
Defining the Computational Structure of the Motion Detector in Drosophila
Clark, D. A., Bursztyn, L., Horowitz, M. A., Schnitzer, M. J., & Clandinin, T. R. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.023 · Cited by 259
Pulvermüller, F. (2010) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.002 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Egelhaaf, M., Borst, A., & Reichardt, W.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1989-07-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1070
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2062764802
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly’s nervous system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.6.001070
- The paper
- Egelhaaf, M., Borst, A., & Reichardt, W. (1989). Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly’s nervous system. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.6.001070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.