The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients
Abstract
The absolute scale of the second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients of several important nonlinear-optical materials has been obtained with improved accuracy. Second-harmonic generation, parametric fluorescence, and difference-frequency generation measurements have been made at several wavelengths in the near-infrared region. The second-harmonic generation measurement was performed at the fundamental wavelengths of 1.548, 1.533, 1.313, 1.064, and 0.852 µm. The materials measured included congruent LiNbO3,1%MgO:LiNbO3,5%MgO:LiNbO3,LiTaO3,KNbO3,KTiOPO4,KH2PO4, quartz, GaAs, GaP, α-ZnS, CdS, ZnSe, and CdTe. We made the parametric fluorescence measurement to determine the nonlinear-optical coefficients of congruent LiNbO3 and 5%MgO:LiNbO3 at pump wavelengths of 0.532 and 0.488 µm. We made the difference-frequency generation measurement for congruent LiNbO3 at a pump wavelength of 0.532 µm. The second-harmonic generation, parametric fluorescence, and difference-frequency generation measurements yielded consistent data on the nonlinear-optical coefficients of the materials. We found that many of the currently accepted standard values are overestimated because of neglect of the multiple-reflection effect in (nearly) plane-parallel-plate samples. The dispersion of the nonlinear-optical coefficients showed that Miller’s Δ is barely constant over the wavelength range measured and thus that Miller’s rule is not so good as other methods for wavelength scaling of the nonlinear-optical coefficients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, C., Langrock, C., Marandi, A., Jankowski, M., Zhang, M., Desiatov, B., Fejer, M. M., & Lončar, M. (2018) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.5.001438 · Cited by 673
Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals
Wu, L., Patankar, S., Morimoto, T., Nair, N. L., Thewalt, E., Little, A., Analytis, J. G., Moore, J. E., & Orenstein, J. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3969 · Cited by 468
Lu, J., Surya, J. B., Liu, X., Bruch, A. W., Gong, Z., Xu, Y., & Tang, H. X. (2019) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.6.001455 · Cited by 445
Random quasi-phase-matching in bulk polycrystalline isotropic nonlinear materials
Baudrier-Raybaut, M., Haïdar, R., Kupecek, P., Lemasson, P., & Rosencher, E. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03027 · Cited by 384
Ultrabroadband nonlinear optics in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides
Jankowski, M., Langrock, C., Desiatov, B., Marandi, A., Wang, C., Zhang, M., Phillips, C. R., Lončar, M., & Fejer, M. M. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.7.000040 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Shoji, I., Kondo, T., Kitamoto, A., Shirane, M., & Ito, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America B
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2268
- ISSN
- 0740-3224 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8540
- OpenAlex
- W2019905881
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josab.14.002268
- The paper
- Shoji, I., Kondo, T., Kitamoto, A., Shirane, M., & Ito, R. (1997). Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.14.002268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.