Laser cooling below the Doppler limit by polarization gradients: simple theoretical models
Abstract
We present two cooling mechanisms that lead to temperatures well below the Doppler limit. These mechanisms are based on laser polarization gradients and work at low laser power when the optical-pumping time between different ground-state sublevels becomes long. There is then a large time lag between the internal atomic response and the atomic motion, which leads to a large cooling force. In the simple case of one-dimensional molasses, we identify two types of polarization gradient that occur when the two counterpropagating waves have either orthogonal linear polarizations or orthogonal circular polarizations. In the first case, the light shifts of the ground-state Zeeman sublevels are spatially modulated, and optical pumping among them leads to dipole forces and to a Sisyphus effect analogous to the one that occurs in stimulated molasses. In the second case (σ+−σ− configuration), the cooling mechanism is radically different. Even at very low velocity, atomic motion produces a population difference among ground-state sublevels, which gives rise to unbalanced radiation pressures. From semiclassical optical Bloch equations, we derive for the two cases quantitative expressions for friction coefficients and velocity capture ranges. The friction coefficients are shown in both cases to be independent of the laser power, which produces an equilibrium temperature proportional to the laser power. The lowest achievable temperatures then approach the one-photon recoil energy. We briefly outline a full quantum treatment of such a limit.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rotational symmetry of Maxwell's equations under duality rotation is associated with the conservation of the helicity of light.
“It is this rotational symmetry that is associated with the conservation of the helicity of light, a connection made by Calkin [17] which ourselves and others have pursued elsewhere within the context of Noether's theorem [15, 30].”
From Optical helicity of interfering waves (2014) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nobel Lecture: The manipulation of neutral particles
Chu, S. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.685 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Collisions of ultracoldtrapped atoms
Julienne, P. S., & Mies, F. H. (1989) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.6.002257 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Optical helicity of interfering waves
Cameron, R. P., Barnett, S. M., & Yao, A. M. (2014) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2013.829874 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dalibard, J., & Cohen-Tannoudji, C.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire Kastler Brossel (FR)
- Collège de France (FR)
- ORCID
- Dalibard, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America B
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1989-11-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2023
- ISSN
- 0740-3224 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8540
- OpenAlex
- W2154510895
- Cited by
- 1,270
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 19.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Optical Society of America B (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
- Keywords
- laser cooling, sub-Doppler cooling, polarization gradient, atomic polarization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review