Cited by 1,270Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum optics and atomic interactionsAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards

Laser cooling below the Doppler limit by polarization gradients: simple theoretical models

Dalibard, J., Cohen-Tannoudji, C.·1989·Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Abstract

We present two cooling mechanisms that lead to temperatures well below the Doppler limit. These mechanisms are based on laser polarization gradients and work at low laser power when the optical-pumping time between different ground-state sublevels becomes long. There is then a large time lag between the internal atomic response and the atomic motion, which leads to a large cooling force. In the simple case of one-dimensional molasses, we identify two types of polarization gradient that occur when the two counterpropagating waves have either orthogonal linear polarizations or orthogonal circular polarizations. In the first case, the light shifts of the ground-state Zeeman sublevels are spatially modulated, and optical pumping among them leads to dipole forces and to a Sisyphus effect analogous to the one that occurs in stimulated molasses. In the second case (σ+−σ− configuration), the cooling mechanism is radically different. Even at very low velocity, atomic motion produces a population difference among ground-state sublevels, which gives rise to unbalanced radiation pressures. From semiclassical optical Bloch equations, we derive for the two cases quantitative expressions for friction coefficients and velocity capture ranges. The friction coefficients are shown in both cases to be independent of the laser power, which produces an equilibrium temperature proportional to the laser power. The lowest achievable temperatures then approach the one-photon recoil energy. We briefly outline a full quantum treatment of such a limit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/josab.6.002023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rotational symmetry of Maxwell's equations under duality rotation is associated with the conservation of the helicity of light.

    “It is this rotational symmetry that is associated with the conservation of the helicity of light, a connection made by Calkin [17] which ourselves and others have pursued elsewhere within the context of Noether's theorem [15, 30].”

    From Optical helicity of interfering waves (2014) · cites this paper as [30]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalibard, J., & Cohen-Tannoudji, C.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire Kastler Brossel (FR)
  • Collège de France (FR)
Venue
Journal of the Optical Society of America B
Published
1989-11-01
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
2023
ISSN
  • 0740-3224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8540
OpenAlex
W2154510895
Cited by
1,270
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 30
FWCI
19.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Optical Society of America B (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
Keywords
laser cooling, sub-Doppler cooling, polarization gradient, atomic polarization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review