The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of principal component analysis and biochemical component analysis in Raman spectroscopy for the discrimination of apoptosis and necrosis in K562 leukemia cells
Open accessAbstract
Raman spectroscopy has been explored as a promising label-free technique in discriminating apoptosis and necrosis induced cell death in leukemia cells. In addition to Principal component analysis (PCA) as commonly employed in Raman data analysis, another less commonly used but powerful method is Biochemical Component Analysis (BCA). In BCA, a Raman spectrum is decomposed into the contributions from several known basic biochemical components, such as proteins, lipid, nucleic acids and glycogen groups etc. The differences in terms of classification accuracy and interpretability of resulting data between these two methods in Raman spectroscopy have not been systematically investigated to our knowledge. In this study, we utilized both methods to analyze the Raman spectra measured from live cells, apoptotic and necrotic leukemia cells. The comparison indicates that two methods yield comparable accuracy in sample classification when the numbers of basic components are equal. The changes in the contributions of biochemical components in BCA can be interpreted by cell biology principles in apoptosis and necrosis. In contrast, the contributions of most principle components in PCA are difficult to interpret except the first one. The capability of BCA to unveil fine biochemical changes in cell spectra and excellent accuracy in classification can impel the broad application of Raman spectroscopy in biological research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Apoptosis: A Review of Programmed Cell Death
Elmore, S. (2007) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1080/01926230701320337 · Cited by 13,853
Spectral Analysis of Multiplex Raman Probe Signatures
Lutz, B. R., Dentinger, C. E., Nguyen, L. N., Sun, L., Zhang, J., Allen, A. N., Chan, S., & Knudsen, B. S. (2008) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn800243g · Cited by 135
A Hybrid Least Squares and Principal Component Analysis Algorithm for Raman Spectroscopy
Van de Sompel, D., Garai, E., Zavaleta, C., & Gambhir, S. S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038850 · Cited by 39
Cited by
Raman spectroscopy: techniques and applications in the life sciences
Shipp, D. W., Sinjab, F., & Notingher, I. (2017) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.9.000315 · Cited by 396
Cell death stages in single apoptotic and necrotic cells monitored by Raman microspectroscopy
Brauchle, E., Thude, S., Brucker, S. Y., & Schenke-Layland, K. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04698 · Cited by 310
Tuberculosis determination using SERS and chemometric methods
Botta, R., Chindaudom, P., Eiamchai, P., Horprathum, M., Limwichean, S., Chananonnawathorn, C., Patthanasettakul, V., Kaewseekhao, B., Faksri, K., & Nuntawong, N. (2018) · Tuberculosis · doi:10.1016/j.tube.2017.12.008 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Ong, Y. H., Lim, M., & Liu, Q.
- Venue
- Optics Express
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2012-09-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 22158
- ISSN
- 1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049147814
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of principal component analysis and biochemical component analysis in Raman spectroscopy for the discrimination of apoptosis and necrosis in K562 leukemia cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/oe.20.022158
- The paper
- Ong, Y. H., Lim, M., & Liu, Q. (2012). Comparison of principal component analysis and biochemical component analysis in Raman spectroscopy for the discrimination of apoptosis and necrosis in K562 leukemia cells. Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.022158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.