The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wave optics theory and 3-D deconvolution for the light field microscope
Open accessAbstract
Light field microscopy is a new technique for high-speed volumetric imaging of weakly scattering or fluorescent specimens. It employs an array of microlenses to trade off spatial resolution against angular resolution, thereby allowing a 4-D light field to be captured using a single photographic exposure without the need for scanning. The recorded light field can then be used to computationally reconstruct a full volume. In this paper, we present an optical model for light field microscopy based on wave optics, instead of previously reported ray optics models. We also present a 3-D deconvolution method for light field microscopy that is able to reconstruct volumes at higher spatial resolution, and with better optical sectioning, than previously reported. To accomplish this, we take advantage of the dense spatio-angular sampling provided by a microlens array at axial positions away from the native object plane. This dense sampling permits us to decode aliasing present in the light field to reconstruct high-frequency information. We formulate our method as an inverse problem for reconstructing the 3-D volume, which we solve using a GPU-accelerated iterative algorithm. Theoretical limits on the depth-dependent lateral resolution of the reconstructed volumes are derived. We show that these limits are in good agreement with experimental results on a standard USAF 1951 resolution target. Finally, we present 3-D reconstructions of pollen grains that demonstrate the improvements in fidelity made possible by our method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Light Field Image Processing: An Overview
Wu, G., Masia, B., Jarabo, A., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Dai, Q., Chai, T., & Liu, Y. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2017.2747126 · Cited by 586
In vivo imaging of neural activity
Yang, W., & Yuste, R. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4230 · Cited by 406
Mapping brain activity at scale with cluster computing
Freeman, J., Vladimirov, N., Kawashima, T., Mu, Y., Sofroniew, N. J., Bennett, D. V., Rosen, J., Yang, C.-T., Looger, L. L., & Ahrens, M. B. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3041 · Cited by 299
Light-sheet functional imaging in fictively behaving zebrafish
Vladimirov, N., Mu, Y., Kawashima, T., Bennett, D. V., Yang, C.-T., Looger, L. L., Keller, P. J., Freeman, J., & Ahrens, M. B. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3040 · Cited by 313
Cerebellar Neurodynamics Predict Decision Timing and Outcome on the Single-Trial Level
Lin, Q., Manley, J., Helmreich, M., Schlumm, F., Li, J. M., Robson, D. N., Engert, F., Schier, A., Nöbauer, T., & Vaziri, A. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.018 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Broxton, M., Grosenick, L., Yang, S., Cohen, N., Andalman, A., Deisseroth, K., & Levoy, M.
- Venue
- Optics Express
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2013-10-17
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 25418
- ISSN
- 1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986142635
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wave optics theory and 3-D deconvolution for the light field microscope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/oe.21.025418
- The paper
- Broxton, M., Grosenick, L., Yang, S., Cohen, N., Andalman, A., Deisseroth, K., & Levoy, M. (2013). Wave optics theory and 3-D deconvolution for the light field microscope. Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.21.025418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.