Cited by 130Lightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaOptical Network TechnologiesOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry

Field measurements of SOP transients in OPGW, with time and location correlation to lightning strikes

Open access
Charlton, Douglas, Clarke, Steven, Doucet, David, O’Sullivan, Maurice, Peterson, Daniel L, Wilson, Darryl, Wellbrock, Glenn, Bélanger, Michel·2017·Optics Express

Abstract

We monitored the state of polarization (SOP) of polarized light in an optical ground wire (OPGW) link located in North America using a test method and apparatus that measured Stokes space angular velocity and geographic location of SOP transients. We observed transients up to 5.1 Mrad/s and were able to correlate these events in both time and location to lightning strikes documented by the United States Precision Lightning Network (USPLN).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.25.009689

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SOPAS has an upper limit bounded by the employed sampling frequency f_s, since the arc length drawn over the Poincaré sphere surface cannot exceed π without resulting in undersampling.

    “Additionally, the SOPAS has an upper limit bounded by the employed sampling frequency 𝑓 𝑠 , since the arc length drawn over the Poincaré sphere surface cannot exceed 𝜋 without resulting in undersampling, as stated in [53].”
  • Lightning strike events have a duration ranging from about 20 to 60 μs.

    “their duration is very brief, ranging from about 20 to 60 𝜇 s, as discussed in [53].”

    From Overview on the state of polarization sensing: application scenarios and anomaly detection algorithms (2025) · cites this paper as [53]

    Section 4 reports a time-and-location correlation between lightning strikes and SOP transients, but gives no strike duration. I searched the indexed copy for “20 to 60 μs,” microsecond-scale durations, and transient duration; no passage states that lightning strikes last about 20–60 μs. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]P. M. Krummrich and K. Kotten, “Extremely fast (microsecond timescale) polarization changes in high speed long haul WDM transmission systems,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2004), paper FI3.
  2. [2]P. M. Krummrich, D. Ronnenberg, W. Schairer, D. Wienold, F. Jenau, and M. Herrmann, “Demanding response time requirements on coherent receivers due to fast polarization rotations caused by lightning events,” Opt. Express 24(11), 12442–12457 (2016). Crossref
  3. [4]J. Wuttke, P. M. Krummrich, and J. Rosch, “Polarization oscillations in aerial fiber caused by wind and power-line current,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 15(6), 882–884 (2003). Crossref
  4. [5]T. Brugière, T. H. R. Crawford, A. Mortelette, M. J. Tanoh, M. Reimer, M. O’Sullivan, D. Doucet, C. Tremblay, D. L. Peterson, T. J. Xia, G. A. Wellbrock, and M. P. Bélanger, “Polarization Activity Monitoring of an Aerial Fiber Link in a Live Network,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2016), paper Tu3G.3. Crossref
  5. [6]L. E. Nelson, M. Birk, S. L. Woodward, and P. Magill, “Field Measurements of Polarization Transients on a Long-Haul Terrestrial Link,” in IEEE Photonic Society 24th Annual Meeting (IEEE,2011), pp. 833–834. Crossref
  6. [7]H. J. Christian, R. J. Blakeslee, D. J. Boccippio, W. L. Boeck, D. E. Buechler, K. T. Driscoll, S. J. Goodman, J. M. Hall, W. J. Koshak, D. M. Mach, and M. F. Stewart, “Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector,” J.Geophys. Res. 108(D1), ACL 4–1-ACL 4–15 (2003). Crossref
  7. [8]M. Kurono, M. Kuribara, and K. Isawa, “Field Measurements and a Study of Transient State of Polarization Produced in OPGW by Lightning,” Electr. Eng. Jpn. 128(4), 55–64 (1999). Crossref
  8. [9]R. Ednay, “Field Trial of PMD Test Methods and Investigation Into the Dynamics of Polarization Effects in a Variety of Installed Cable Environments,” in Terena Networking Conference, (2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charlton, D., Clarke, S., Doucet, D., O’Sullivan, M., Peterson, D. L., Wilson, D., Wellbrock, G., & Bélanger, M.
Affiliations
  • Ciena (Canada) (CA)
  • Verizon (United States) (US)
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2017-04-19
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
9689
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606939948
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Network Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Keywords
OPGW, polarization state, lightning strikes, Stokes parameters, optical fiber communication, field measurements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review