Multi-intensity Bending Eavesdropping Detection and Identification Scheme Based on the State of Polarization
Abstract
Bending eavesdropping induces fast polarization state transients. We propose a detection scheme for bending eavesdropping, enabling physical layer protection. The accuracy of identifying multi-intensity bending eavesdropping reaches 95.38% by calculating the polarization rotation angular rate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The communication system may undergo a minor power reduction and a bending-induced change in SOP, both of which can be detected by an SOP detection system.
“The communication system may undergo a minor power reduction [37,38] and a bending-induced change in SOP [39], both of which can be detected by an SOP detection system.”
From Resilient Anomaly Detection in Fiber-Optic Networks: A Machine Learning Framework for Multi-Threat Identification Using State-of-Polarization Monitoring (2025) · cites this paper as [39]
One consequence of fiber spoofing for the communication system is a small received power drop, in parallel with a bending-induced SOP variation, both of which can be detected by a SOP-sensing system.
“One of the consequences for the communication system is a small received power drop [48,49], in parallel with a bending-induced SOP variation [50], both of which can be detected by a SOP-sensing system.”
From Overview on the state of polarization sensing: application scenarios and anomaly detection algorithms (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Charlton, D., Clarke, S., Doucet, D., O’Sullivan, M., Peterson, D. L., Wilson, D., Wellbrock, G., & Bélanger, M. (2017) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.25.009689 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Natalino, C., Schiano, M., Di Giglio, A., Wosinska, L., & Furdek, M. (2019) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2019.2923558 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Tanaka, T., Inui, T., Kawai, S., Kuwabara, S., & Nishizawa, H. (2021) · Journal of Optical Communications and Networking · doi:10.1364/jocn.424428 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Digital Backpropagation for Optical Path Monitoring: Loss Profile and Passband Narrowing Estimation
Sasai, T., Nakamura, M., Yamazaki, E., et al. (2020) · European Conference on Optical Communication · doi:10.1109/ecoc48923.2020.9333191 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Fiber Link Anomaly Detection and Estimation Based on Signal Nonlinearity
Gleb, S., Konstantin, P., Luo, J. Q., et al. (2021) · European Conference on Optical Communication · doi:10.1109/ecoc52684.2021.9606094 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Song, H., Li, Y., Liu, M., et al. (2021) · Optical Fiber Technology · doi:10.1016/j.yofte.2021.102669 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationField Demonstration of Real-time Optical Network Diagnosis Using Deep Neural Network and Telemetry
Tanaka, T., Kuwabara, S., Nishizawa, H., et al. (2019) · Optical Fiber Communication Conference · doi:10.1364/ofc.2019.tu2e.5 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Implementing and testing a fiber-optic polarization-based intrusion detection system
Hajj, R. E., Macdonald, G., Verma, P. K., et al. (2015) · Optical Engineering · doi:10.1117/1.oe.54.9.096107 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Comprehensive security strategy for all-optical networks
Feffer, A. (2015) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Stokes Parameters Representation
(2011) · SPIE eBooks · doi:10.1117/3.861761.ch6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
DETECTING EAVESDROPPING ACTIVITY IN FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS
Macdonald, G. (2012) · SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pellegrini, S., Minelli, L., Andrenacci, L., Rizzelli, G., Pilori, D., Bosco, G., Della Chiesa, L., Crognale, C., Piciaccia, S., & Gaudino, R. (2025) · Journal of Optical Communications and Networking · doi:10.1364/jocn.537881 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Malik, G., Dipto, I. C., Masood, M. U., Mohamed, M. C., Straullu, S., Bhyri, S. K., Galimberti, G. M., Napoli, A., Pedro, J., Wakim, W., et al. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6070131 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lei, Q., Li, Y., Song, H., Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Beitsing Communications Technology Co., Ltd.,Beijing,China,100088
- Venue
- 2023 Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-07-02
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W4385800815
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Soochow University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Network Technologies
- Keywords
- polarization state, physical layer security, eavesdropping detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
