Cited by 97Spectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Highly sensitive methane detection based on light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy with a 2.33 µm diode laser and adaptive Savitzky-Golay filtering

Open access
Liu, Xiaonan, Qiao, Shunda, Ma, Yufei·2022·Optics Express

Abstract

In this manuscript, a highly sensitive methane (CH 4 ) sensor based on light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy (LITES) using a 2.33 µm diode laser with high power is demonstrated for the first time. A quartz tuning fork (QTF) with an intrinsic resonance frequency of 32.768 kHz was used to detect the light-induced thermoelastic signal. A Herriot multi-pass cell with an effective optical path of 10 m was adopted to increase the laser absorption. The laser wavelength modulation depth and concentration response of this CH 4 -LITES sensor were investigated. The sensor showed excellent long term stability when Allan deviation analysis was performed. An adaptive Savitzky-Golay (S-G) filtering algorithm with χ 2 statistical criterion was firstly introduced to the LITES technique. The SNR of this CH 4 -LITES sensor was improved by a factor of 2.35 and the minimum detection limit (MDL) with an integration time of 0.1 s was optimized to 0.5 ppm. This reported CH 4 -LITES sensor with sub ppm-level detection ability is of great value in applications such as environmental monitoring and industrial safety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.446294

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Evans, 2007, New Phytol., 175, 1, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02114.x · DOI
  2. Borowski, 2020, Energies, 13, 4429, 10.3390/en13174429 · DOI
  3. Dursun, 2020, Nat. Hazards, 104, 329, 10.1007/s11069-020-04170-x · DOI
  4. Kundu, 2018, Powder Technol., 323, 95, 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.09.041 · DOI
  5. Su, 2020, J. Cent. South Univ., 27, 2382, 10.1007/s11771-020-4456-1 · DOI
  6. Li, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 695, 133815, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133815 · DOI
  7. Qiao, 2021, Opt. Lett., 46, 977, 10.1364/OL.418520 · DOI
  8. Rousseau, 2019, Opt. Express, 27, 7435, 10.1364/OE.27.007435 · DOI
  9. Ma, 2021, Acta Phys. Sin., 70, 160702, 10.7498/aps.70.20210685 · DOI
  10. Zheng, 2020, Photoacoustics, 17, 100158, 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100158 · DOI
  11. Ma, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 1008, 10.1364/OE.21.001008 · DOI
  12. Waclawek, 2016, Opt. Express, 24, 6559, 10.1364/OE.24.006559 · DOI
  13. Qiao, 2021, Opt. Lett., 46, 2449, 10.1364/OL.423801 · DOI
  14. Zhang, 2018, Sensors, 18, 4295, 10.3390/s18124295 · DOI
  15. Yang, 2020, Optik, 224, 165657, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165657 · DOI
  16. Ma, 2016, Sens. Actuators B, 233, 388, 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.114 · DOI
  17. Wu, 2015, Appl. Phys. Lett., 107, 111104, 10.1063/1.4930995 · DOI
  18. Ma, 2018, Opt. Express, 26, 32103, 10.1364/OE.26.032103 · DOI
  19. Lang, 2021, Photoacoustics, 22, 100272, 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100272 · DOI
  20. Russo, 2020, Opt. Express, 28, 19074, 10.1364/OE.393292 · DOI
  21. Ma, 2020, Appl. Phys. Lett., 116, 011103, 10.1063/1.5129014 · DOI
  22. Zhou, 2021, Opt. Lett., 46, 496, 10.1364/OL.406103 · DOI
  23. He, 2019, Opt. Lett., 44, 1904, 10.1364/OL.44.001904 · DOI
  24. Qiao, 2021, Opt. Express, 29, 25100, 10.1364/OE.434128 · DOI
  25. Hu, 2021, Opt. Express, 29, 5121, 10.1364/OE.418256 · DOI
  26. Lou, 2021, Opt. Express, 29, 12195, 10.1364/OE.421356 · DOI
  27. Ma, 2020, Photoacoustics, 20, 100206, 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100206 · DOI
  28. Hu, 2020, Opt. Lett., 45, 1894, 10.1364/OL.388754 · DOI
  29. Hu, 2021, Photoacoustics, 21, 100230, 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100230 · DOI
  30. Li, 2015, Appl. Spectrosc, 69, 496, 10.1366/14-07629 · DOI
  31. Truyols, 2006, Anal. Chem., 78, 4598, 10.1021/ac0600196 · DOI
  32. Lu, 2019, Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal., 39, 2657, 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)09-2657-07 · DOI
  33. Schulze, 2008, Appl. Spectrosc., 62, 1160, 10.1366/000370208786049079 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 97

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Qiao, S., & Ma, Y.
Affiliations
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2022-01-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
1304
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200142333
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 56
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61505041, 61875047, 62022032)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (YQ2019F006)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation (LBH-Q18052)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Keywords
methane detection, light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy, quartz tuning fork, detection limit, Allan deviation, signal-to-noise ratio, laser absorption spectroscopy, gas sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review