Cited by 65Semiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesPhotonic and Optical DevicesAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Error-free 1 Tbps WDM Optical I/O Chiplet and Multi-wavelength Multi-port Laser

Wade, M., Anderson, E., Ardalan, S., Bae, W., Beheshtian, B., Buchbinder, S., Chang, K., Chao, P., Eachempatti, H., Frey, J., Jan, E., Katzin, A., Khilo, A., Kita, D., Krishnamoorthy, U., Li, C., Lu, H., Luna, F., Madden, C., Okada, L., Patel, M., Ramamurthy, C., Raval, M., Roucka, R., Robberson, K., Rust, M., Van Orden, D., Zeng, R., Zhang, M., Stojanovic, V., Sedgwick, F., Meade, R., Chan, N., Fini, J., Kim, B., Liu, S., Zhang, C., Jeong, D., Bhargava, P., Sysak, M., Sun, C.·2021·Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2021

Abstract

We demonstrate 128 Gbps/port (8-λ × 16 Gbps/λ) natively error-free transmission across eight optical ports using a 8-port, 8-λ/port WDM remote laser source and a pair of monolithically integrated CMOS optical I/O chiplets with 4.96-5.56 pJ/bit optical Tx+Rx chiplet energy efficiency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ofc.2021.f3c.6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microring-modulator (MRM)-based IMDD transceivers demonstrated the multiplexing and energy-efficiency benefits of PIC technology.

    “Microring-modulator (MRM)-based IMDD transceivers (see Fig. 2a) demonstrated the multiplexing and energy-efficiency benefits of PIC technology20–22.”

    From Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wade, M., Anderson, E., Ardalan, S., Bae, W., Beheshtian, B., Buchbinder, S., Chang, K., Chao, P., Eachempatti, H., Frey, J., Jan, E., Katzin, A., Khilo, A., Kita, D., Krishnamoorthy, U., Li, C., Lu, H., Luna, F., Madden, C., Okada, L., Patel, M., Ramamurthy, C., Raval, M., Roucka, R., Robberson, K., Rust, M., Van Orden, D., Zeng, R., Zhang, M., Stojanovic, V., Sedgwick, F., Meade, R., Chan, N., Fini, J., Kim, B., Liu, S., Zhang, C., Jeong, D., Bhargava, P., Sysak, M., & Sun, C.
Affiliations
Ayar Labs (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wade, M.
  • Anderson, E.
  • Ardalan, S.
  • Bae, W.
  • Beheshtian, B.
  • Buchbinder, S.
  • Chang, K.
  • Chao, P.
  • Eachempatti, H.
  • Frey, J.
  • Jan, E.
  • Katzin, A.
  • Khilo, A.
  • Kita, D.
  • Krishnamoorthy, U.
  • Li, C.
  • Lu, H.
  • Luna, F.
  • Madden, C.
  • Okada, L.
  • Ramamurthy, C.
  • Raval, M.
  • Roucka, R.
  • Robberson, K.
  • Rust, M.
  • Zeng, R.
  • Zhang, M.
  • Stojanovic, V.
  • Sedgwick, F.
  • Meade, R.
  • Chan, N.
  • Fini, J.
  • Kim, B.
  • Liu, S.
  • Zhang, C.
  • Jeong, D.
  • Bhargava, P.
  • Sysak, M.
  • Sun, C.
Venue
Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2021
Published
2021
Pages
F3C.6
OpenAlex
W3191988507
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7
FWCI
18.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Optical Fiber Communication Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
Keywords
wavelength division multiplexing, multi-wavelength laser, error-free transmission, optical transceivers, energy efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review