Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,250

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography

Open access
de Boer, Johannes F., Cense, Barry, Park, B. Hyle, Pierce, Mark C., Tearney, Guillermo J., Bouma, Brett E.·2003·Optics Letters

Abstract

A signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis is presented for optical coherence tomography (OCT) signals in which time-domain performance is compared with that of the spectral domain. A significant SNR gain of several hundredfold is found for acquisition in the spectral domain. The SNR benefit is demonstrated experimentally in a hybrid time-domain-spectral-domain OCT system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.28.002067

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,250

Metadata

Authors
de Boer, J. F., Cense, B., Park, B. H., Pierce, M. C., Tearney, G. J., & Bouma, B. E.
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
28
Issue
21
Pages
2067
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
OpenAlex
W2044375609
Cited by
1,250
References
0
FWCI
35.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ol.28.002067
The paper
de Boer, J. F., Cense, B., Park, B. H., Pierce, M. C., Tearney, G. J., & Bouma, B. E. (2003). Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.28.002067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.