Cited by 449Optical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing

Optical coherence tomography (OCT): principle and technical realization

Open access
Aumann, Silke, Donner, Sabine, Fischer, Jörg, Müller, Frank·2019·High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive technique for cross-sectional tissue imaging. It typically uses light in the near-infrared spectral range which has a penetration depth of several hundred microns in tissue. The backscattered light is measured with an interferometric set-up to reconstruct the depth profile of the sample at the selected location. A scanning OCT beam allows for acquisition of cross-sectional images of the tissue structure. Different technical methods are introduced and compared regarding their properties like sensitivity, imaging speed and penetration depth. Regardless of the technical realization, axial resolution and imaging range of an OCT system are determined by light source and detector characteristics. Combining retinal OCT with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope allows for motion tracking during acquisition and to examine the exact same position at any time again. Segmentation of features is the basis for automatic depth measurements and standardized measurements to be compared with normative databases. New trends show the ability of functional OCT to image flow, polarizing properties of tissue and even mechanical properties like elasticity. Recent approaches to improve the resolution and the acquisition speed show the ongoing research interest in OCT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-16638-0_3

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kou L, Labrie D, Chylek P. Refractive indices of water and ice in the 0.65-to 2.5-microm spectral range. Appl Optics. 1993;32(19):3531-40.
  2. Liu Y-Z, et al. Computational optical coherence tomog- raphy. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8(3):1549-74.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aumann, S., Donner, S., Fischer, J., & Müller, F.
Affiliations
Heidelberg Engineering (Germany) (DE)
Venue
High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology
Published
2019
Pages
59-85
OpenAlex
W2967073593
Cited by
449
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 15
FWCI
44.32
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Heidelberg Engineering GmbH
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Keywords
optical coherence tomography, retinal imaging, near-infrared light, interferometry, axial resolution, penetration depth, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, motion tracking, image segmentation, depth measurement, tissue elasticity imaging, imaging speed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review