CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 108

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vortex sensing diffraction gratings

Moreno, Ignacio, Davis, Jeffrey A., Pascoguin, B. Melvin L., Mitry, Mark J., Cottrell, Don M.·2009·Optics Letters
DOI 10.1364/ol.34.002927
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We demonstrate a specially designed vortex sensing diffraction grating that generates multiple vortex patterns in the different diffracted orders. When this grating is illuminated with a separate vortex beam, the sign and order of the topological charge of the incident beam can be easily detected. Experimental results are shown for a variety of vortex beams including fractional values of the topological charge, and where both the diffraction grating and incident vortex illumination beam are generated by two different liquid crystal displays (LCDs). The programmability offered by the LCDs offers extremely convenient flexibility.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.34.002927

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same diffraction grating can be used to detect an input vector beam in a similar manner as a vortex diffraction grating can detect a scalar vortex beam.

    “The same diffraction grating demonstrated above can be used to detect an input vector beam in a similar manner as a vortex diffraction grating can detect a scalar vortex beam11.”

    From Vector Beam Polarization State Spectrum Analyzer (2017) · cites this paper as [11]

  • These results show a generalization to vector beams of the technique previously used with scalar vortex beams, which is now widely used as a mode sorter in vortex based communication systems.

    “These results thus show a generalization to vector beams of the technique previously used with scalar vortex beams11, which is now widely used as a mode sorter in vortex based communication systems4, 9.”

    From Vector Beam Polarization State Spectrum Analyzer (2017) · cites this paper as [11]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Dirac, 1931, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 133, 60, 10.1098/rspa.1931.0130 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Nye, 1974, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 336, 165, 10.1098/rspa.1974.0012 · DOI
  3. He, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 826, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.826 · DOI
  4. Gahagan, 1996, Opt. Lett., 21, 827, 10.1364/OL.21.000827 · DOI
  5. Coullet, 1989, Opt. Commun., 73, 403, 10.1016/0030-4018(89)90180-6 · DOI
  6. Heckenberg, 1992, Opt. Lett., 17, 221, 10.1364/OL.17.000221 · DOI
  7. Reicherter, 1999, Opt. Lett., 24, 608, 10.1364/OL.24.000608 · DOI
  8. Berry, 2004, J. Opt. A., 6, 259, 10.1088/1464-4258/6/2/018 · DOI
  9. Crabtree, 2004, Appl. Opt., 42, 1360, 10.1364/AO.43.001360 · DOI
  10. Mair, 2001, Nature, 412, 313, 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Leach, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 013601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.013601 · DOI
  12. Gibson, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 5448, 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  13. Niv, 2008, Opt. Lett., 33, 2910, 10.1364/OL.33.002910 · DOI
  14. Bekshaev, 2008, Opt. Commun., 281, 1366, 10.1016/j.optcom.2007.11.032 · DOI
  15. Davis, 2005, Appl. Opt., 44, 4049, 10.1364/AO.44.004049 · DOI
  16. Curtis, 2004, Opt. Lett., 28, 872, 10.1364/OL.28.000872 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moreno, I., Davis, J. A., Pascoguin, B. M. L., Mitry, M. J., & Cottrell, D. M.
Venue
Optics Letters
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2009-09-21
Volume
34
Issue
19
Pages
2927
ISSN
  • 0146-9592
  • 1539-4794
DOI
10.1364/ol.34.002927
Cited by
108
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (FIS2009-13955-C02-02)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review