Cited by 31Orbital Angular Momentum in OpticsOptical Polarization and EllipsometryMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 15 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Vector Beam Polarization State Spectrum Analyzer

Open access
Moreno, Ignacio, Davis, Jeffrey A., Badham, Katherine, Sánchez-López, María M., Holland, Joseph E., Cottrell, Don M.·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

We present a proof of concept for a vector beam polarization state spectrum analyzer based on the combination of a polarization diffraction grating (PDG) and an encoded harmonic q-plate grating (QPG). As a result, a two-dimensional polarization diffraction grating is formed that generates six different q-plate channels with topological charges from −3 to +3 in the horizontal direction, and each is split in the vertical direction into the six polarization channels at the cardinal points of the corresponding higher-order Poincaré sphere. Consequently, 36 different channels are generated in parallel. This special polarization diffractive element is experimentally demonstrated using a single phase-only spatial light modulator in a reflective optical architecture. Finally, we show that this system can be used as a vector beam polarization state spectrum analyzer, where both the topological charge and the state of polarization of an input vector beam can be simultaneously determined in a single experiment. We expect that these results would be useful for applications in optical communications.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper demonstrates a proof-of-concept vector beam polarization state spectrum analyzer using a two-dimensional polarization diffraction grating encoded on a single phase-only SLM, generating 36 channels in parallel. It shows single-shot identification of an input vector beam’s topological charge and polarization state via a bright delta-like diffraction order, though quantitative polarimetry is limited by detector and SLM resolution.

Key findings

  • A combined horizontal harmonic q-plate grating and vertical polarization grating produced a 6 × 6 array of 36 vector beams in a single shot: horizontal orders encoded q-plates with q = ±1/2, ±1, and ±3/2, corresponding to topological charges ℓ = ±1, ±2, and ±3, while vertical orders encoded the six cardinal polarization states of the higher-order Poincaré sphere.
  • The phase grating design generated six equally intense target diffraction orders k = ±1, ±2, ±3, with total diffraction efficiency exceeding 90% and each target order around |Gk|² ≈ 15%.
  • As an analyzer, matching the input vector beam’s q-plate charge to an encoded q-plate produced a bright delta-like spot at the corresponding horizontal order; this was demonstrated with input q-plates q = +1, +1/2, −1/2, and −1, and with a q = 1 plate under vertical, 45°, and RCP illumination, where the bright spot remained at kx = +2 but moved to different vertical orders.
  • The relative intensities of the six delta functions along the vertical direction are described as a direct measurement of the generalized Stokes parameters of the input vector beam, but the paper reports that the detector array lacked sufficient resolution to measure these strengths accurately.

Methods

  • Proof-of-concept optical experiment using an argon laser at 514 nm, a spatial filter, a linear polarizer and quarter-wave plate, a 52 cm collimating lens, and a circular aperture equivalent to 240 SLM pixels; the key element was a transmissive zero-twist liquid-crystal SLM with 640 × 480 pixels and 42 μm pixel size, used in a double-pass reflective architecture with a non-polarizing beam-splitter, quarter-wave plates, a 37 cm lens, and a mirror, with a final QWP/linear-polarizer analyzer and WinCamD camera.
  • Design based on Jones matrix decomposition of a q-plate into a half-wave retarder and polarization rotator, implemented by encoding two independent phase patterns on orthogonal linear polarizations using two halves of the SLM; harmonic q-plate gratings were created by embedding spiral phases into optimized phase-only gratings using the Romero–Dickey procedure and look-up tables.
  • The vertical polarization grating was optimized for six target orders with specified complex amplitudes for horizontal and vertical polarizations; detection experiments used commercial Thorlabs q-plates with q = 1/2 and q = 1, and negative equivalents generated by inserting the q-plate between two half-wave plates.

Limitations

  • The paper states this is a proof-of-concept experiment; the detector array does not have sufficient resolution to accurately measure the strengths of the delta functions, and precise higher-order polarimetric measurements would require better resolution both in the detector and in the SLM encoding the grating.
  • The paper notes that saturated images were used, causing other diffraction orders to be visible despite the phase gratings’ ~90% total diffraction efficiency; it also notes that the SLM’s programmability was not utilized, and suggests fixed photolithographic polarizing optical elements for higher efficiency and resolution in applications requiring more elements.
  • Evident from the text: the analyzer projects onto only six cardinal polarization states, not arbitrary polarization states, and no quantitative Stokes parameter measurements are reported; the SLM has limited resolution (640 × 480, 42 μm pixels) and the two circular phase masks have a radius of only 120 pixels, requiring precise alignment.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-02328-5

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

3 of 15 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationown data

    These results show a generalization to vector beams of the technique previously used with scalar vortex beams, which is now widely used as a mode sorter in vortex based communication systems.

    “These results thus show a generalization to vector beams of the technique previously used with scalar vortex beams11, which is now widely used as a mode sorter in vortex based communication systems4, 9.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Moreno, I., Davis, J. A., Pascoguin, B. M. L., Mitry, M. J. & Cottrell, D. M. Vortex sensing diffraction gratings. Opt. Lett. 34, 2927–2929 (2009). source
    • cites [4] Lei, T. et al. Massive individual orbital angular momentum channels for multiplexing enabled by Dammann gratings. Light: Sci. & Appl. 4, e257 (2015). source

      The Results and Discussion (p. 5) describe a Dammann optical vortex grating that separates OAM channels for detection, supporting its use as a mode sorter in vortex-based communications. The paper demonstrates and proposes this use, but does not establish that the technique is already widely used. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [9] Huang, H. et al. Mode division multiplexing using an orbital angular momentum mode sorter and MIMO-DSP over a graded-index few-mode optical fibre. Sci. Rep. 5, 14931 (2015). source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The grating designs provide diffraction efficiencies much higher than others have obtained.

    “We note that our grating designs provide diffraction efficiencies using this procedure are much higher than others have obtained28.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Fu, S., Zhang, S., Wang, T. & Gao, C. Rectilinear lattices of polarization vortices with various spatial polarization distributions. Opt. Express 24, 18486–18491 (2016). source

      The Results and discussions section says the paper’s holograms cannot reach 100% diffraction efficiency in theory, but gives no efficiency value or comparison establishing that the citing authors’ designs are much higher. Searches for comparative efficiencies and the claimed wording found no supporting passage in our copy; no page number is available. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingnone given

    The combined diffractive element consists of two orthogonal grating structures.

    “In our approach, we create a combined diffractive element that consists of two orthogonal grating structures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    The polarization diffraction grating in the vertical diffracted orders gives each order a different polarization state on the zero-order Poincaré sphere.

    “In addition, we combine this with a previously reported polarization diffraction grating17 in the vertical diffracted orders where each order has a different polarization state on the zero-order Poincaré sphere.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Davis, J. A. et al. Diffraction gratings generating orders with selective states of polarization. Opt. Express 24, 907–917 (2016). source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Findingreasoning

    Each of the six q-plate channels is split in the vertical direction into six polarization channels at the cardinal points of the corresponding higher-order Poincaré sphere.

    “and each is split in the vertical direction into the six polarization channels at the cardinal points of the corresponding higher-order Poincaré sphere.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The polarization state of a vector beam can be determined by projections onto the six cardinal points of the appropriate Poincaré sphere.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 27
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    A zero-order beam is produced that appears as a bright spot denoting that no singularity appears in this order.

    “A zero-order beam is also produced, that appears as a bright spot denoting that no singularity appears in this order.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In Fig. 6(c) and (d), the bright spot keeps the horizontal order kx = +2, as corresponds to a vector beam with topological charge 2, but appears at different vertical orders, corresponding to the different polarization state.

    “Note that in these two cases the bright spot keeps the horizontal order k x = + 2, as corresponds to a vector beam with topological charge 2, but appears at different vertical orders, corresponding to the different polarization state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    In Fig. 5(c) and (d), with input vector beams with negative charge (q = −1/2 and q = −1), the bright spot shifts to the left orders, providing a positive detection of the corresponding vector beams.

    “Now we see how the bright spot shifts to the left orders, providing a positive detection of the corresponding vector beams.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The polarization diffraction grating generates six diffraction orders with equal intensity, but the states of polarization change in each order.

    “Six diffraction orders with equal intensity are generated, but the states of polarization change in each order, according to the definition in the left column of Fig. 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    In the 2D grating, horizontal order kx encodes different q-plate devices with q-values q = kx/2, while vertical orders ky encode different equivalent input polarizations corresponding to the six cardinal points of the Poincaré sphere.

    “The horizontal order k x encodes different q-plate devices, with q-values q = k x/2, while the vertical orders k y encode different equivalent input polarizations corresponding to the six cardinal points of the Poincaré sphere, with the same sequence as in Fig. 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The other diffraction orders generate higher-order radial polarizations, verified by all beams showing a bright area at the vertical direction.

    “In addition, the other diffraction orders generate higher-order radial polarizations (this can be verified by the fact that all beams show a bright area at the vertical direction).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In all cases shown in Fig. 6, an array of 6 × 6 beams is obtained, and in each case there is a diffraction order that shows a bright point (delta function) revealing the detection of a given vector beam.

    “In all cases we obtain again an array of 6 × 6 beams as in Fig. 5, but notice that in each case there is a diffraction order that shows a bright point (delta function) revealing the detection of a given vector beam.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In Fig. 6(c) and (d), with the same input q = 1 plate illuminated with linearly polarized light oriented at 45° and with RCP polarization respectively, a slanted second order vector beam is generated in the first case and a scalar LCP vortex beam is generated in the second case.

    “Therefore, in the first case a slanted second order vector beam is generated (Fig. 6(c)), while in the second case a scalar LCP vortex beam is generated (Fig. 6(d)) as the beam input to the vector beam polarization state spectrum analyzer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A q-plate with q = 1 illuminated with linear polarization oriented at 45° produces a slanted second-order vector beam.
    • Rests on an assumption: A q-plate with q = 1 illuminated with RCP polarization produces a scalar LCP vortex beam.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The polarization diffraction grating encodes six different polarization states in the six vertical diffraction orders: k=+3 rotated by −45° to vertical, k=+2 unchanged, k=+1 rotated by +45°, k=−1 rotated by +90°, k=−2 LCP, and k=−3 RCP.

    “In the diffraction order k = + 3, the polarization will be rotated by −45°, to become vertically polarized. In order k = + 2 the polarization will remain unchanged. In orders k = + 1 and k = −1, the polarizations will be rotated by +45° and +90° respectively. Finally, in orders k = −2 and k = −3, the polarizations will be converted into LCP and RCP.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In Fig. 5, the rest of the diffraction orders show vector beams, but the charge is symmetric around the order showing the delta function (bright spot).

    “Note how the rest of the diffraction orders show vector beams, but the charge is symmetric around the order showing the delta function (bright spot).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The difference in charge can be noticed in the size of the singularity and in the number of bright lobes (for linear states) that appear in each diffraction order.

    “The difference in charge can be noticed in the size of the singularity and in the number of bright lobes (for linear states) that appear in each diffraction order.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    In the experimental generation without analyzer, six diffraction orders are generated with topological charge kl = ±1, ±2, ±3, since the embedded spiral phases have values l = 1.

    “In this case six diffraction orders are generated, where the topological charge goes as kℓ = ± 1, ±2, ±3, since the embedded spiral phases have values ℓ = 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    The system generates, in a single shot, 6 × 6 different vector beams where the horizontal order shows different topological charge, while the vertical order shows different states of polarization.

    “As a result, we are able to generate, in a single shot, 6 × 6 different vector beams where the horizontal order shows different topological charge, while the vertical order shows different states of polarization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    Some other diffraction orders are visible because the images were captured saturated.

    “Although the total diffraction efficiencies of the phase gratings reach about 90%, some other diffraction orders are visible because we captured saturated images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In Fig. 6(a), with input q-plate q = 1/2 illuminated with vertical linear polarization, an intense bright diffraction order appears at (kx = +1, ky = +3), while the order at (kx = +1, ky = +1) vanishes, corresponding to the azimuthal polarization orthogonal to the radial polarization.

    “Note how an intense bright diffraction order appears on the (k x = + 1, k y = + 3) location, while the order at location (k x = + 1, k y = + 1) vanishes (this order corresponds to the azimuthal polarization, which is the vector beam orthogonal to the radial polarization).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A q-plate with q = 1/2 illuminated with vertical linear polarization produces a radially polarized beam.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The vector beam nature of the beams is revealed when an analyzer is included; with a vertical linear analyzer, a number of 2kl lobes appear in each diffraction order.

    “The vector beam nature of these beams is clearly revealed when an analyzer is included in the system. This is shown in Fig. 2(b), where a vertical linear analyzer is used. Now a number of 2kℓ lobes appear in each diffraction order.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The resulting patterns in Fig. 5(a) and (b) show that the diffraction order showing the bright spot moved to the second and first diffraction orders when input q-plates with q = 1 and q = 1/2 are selected, respectively.

    “The resulting patterns in Fig. 5(a) and (b) show how the diffraction order showing the bright spot has now moved to the second and first diffraction orders when input q-plates with q = 1 and q = 1/2 are selected respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    In the two-dimensional grating, the horizontal direction encodes q-plate devices Mkxq that depend on the horizontal order kx, while the vertical direction encodes different polarization elements Mky: orders ky = +3, +2, +1 and −1 encode polarization rotators of rotation angles −π/4, 0, +π/4 and π/2 respectively, and orders ky = −2 and ky = −3 encode LCP and RCP polarizers.

    “Now we have a two dimensional grating, where the horizontal direction encodes q-plate devices Mkxq that depend on the horizontal order k x while the vertical direction encodes the different polarization elements Mky described in subsection 3.2, i.e., orders k y = + 3, +2, +1 and −1 encode polarization rotators of rotation angles of −π/4, 0, +π/4 and π/2 respectively, and orders k y = −2 and k y =”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In Fig. 6(b), with input q-plate q = 1 illuminated with vertical linear polarization, the delta function shifted to (kx = +2, ky = +3) and the null order shifted to (kx = +2, ky = +1).

    “Note how now the delta function has shifted to (k x = + 2, k y = + 3) and the null order has shifted to (k x = + 2, k y = + 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A q-plate with q = 1 illuminated with vertical linear polarization produces a second-order radially polarized beam.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    The phase grating is designed to provide the same intensity value of around |Gk|2≈15% for all six target diffraction orders, giving equal strength for each encoded q-plate.

    “The phase grating is designed to provide the same intensity value of around |G k|2≈15% for all six target diffraction orders, thus giving equal strength for each encoded q-plate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The special polarization diffraction grating has been experimentally realized with an optical system using a single parallel-aligned SLM, and the experimental results probe in each case the successful parallel generation of an array of vector beams, or the successful detection of the order and particular polarization of an input vector beam.

    “This special polarization diffraction grating has been experimentally realized with an optical system using a single parallel-aligned SLM, and the experimental results probe in each case the successful parallel generation of an array of vector beams, or the successful detection of the order and particular polarization of an input vector beam.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    The images were saturated in order to show that, when a polarization analyzer is included, the diffraction order with the orthogonal state of polarization vanishes.

    “The images are saturated in order to show that, when a polarization analyzer is included in the system before the CCD detector, the diffraction order with the orthogonal state of polarization vanishes, as shown in Fig. 3 marked with a red arrow.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Precise higher-order polarimetric measurements would require better resolution both in the detector and in the SLM encoding the grating.

    “Such precise higher-order polarimetric measurements would require better resolution both in the detector, and in the SLM encoding the grating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given

    We have the components necessary for building the Stokes parameters if they are required.

    “In addition, we have the components necessary for building the Stokes parameters if they are required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since the six polarization elements encoded in the vertical direction provide six transformations yielding the six cardinal states of the Poincaré sphere out of input vertical polarized state, the system can be used to perform generalized polarimetry measurements on vector beams.

    “Since the six polarization elements encoded in the vertical direction provide six transformations yielding the six cardinal states of the Poincaré sphere out of input vertical polarized state, the system can be used to perform generalized polarimetry measurements on vector beams.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When the order of the q-plate generating the input vector beam matches the order of one of the q-plates encoded in the grating (qin − kq = 0), the matrix Mqin-kq becomes an identity matrix and the output is no longer a vector beam but a uniformly polarized beam.

    “Therefore, note that when the order of the q-plate generating the input vector beam matches the order of one of the q-plates encoded in the grating, so q in−kq = 0, then the matrix Mqin-kq becomes an identity matrix and the output is no longer a vector beam but a uniformly polarized beam.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Obtaining any elliptically polarized state requires the design of the appropriate gratings as discussed earlier.

    “Obtaining any elliptically polarized state requires the design of the appropriate gratings as discussed earlier.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    If the beam incident on the system is already a vector beam, the spiral phase structures in the incoming beam cancel those phases embedded in the gratings, and the result is a delta function at a higher diffraction order where these phases cancel.

    “If the beam incident on the system is already a vector beam, the spiral phase structures in the incoming beam cancel those phases embedded in the gratings, and the result is a delta function at a higher diffraction order where these phases cancel33.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Ndagano, B., Sroor, H., McLaren, M., Rosales-Guzmán, C. & Forbes, A. Beam quality measure for vector beams. Opt. Lett. 41, 3407–3410 (2016). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The detection scheme can also be described as a vector beam polarization correlation system.

    “In addition, we note that the detection scheme can also be described as a vector beam polarization correlation system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The intensity becomes weaker as the diffraction order increases because higher diffraction orders with higher topological charges result in doughnut focalizations with larger diameter.

    “However, since higher diffraction orders with higher topological charges result in doughnut focalizations with larger diameter, the intensity becomes weaker as the order increases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The same system can be used as a vector beam polarization state spectrum analyzer capable of identifying the order of an input vector beam as well as the particular state of polarization.

    “The same system can be used as a vector beam polarization state spectrum analyzer, capable to identify the order of an input vector beam as well as the particular state of polarization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When the encoded q-plate matches the order with the incoming vector beam, a uniformly polarized beam is produced (a delta function diffraction order), and the state of polarization is given by the product MkyE0.

    “Therefore, again, when the encoded q-plate matches the order with the incoming vector beam, a uniformly polarized beam is produced (a delta function diffraction order), and the state of polarization will be given by the product MkyE0.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The polarization state of a vector beam can be determined by projections onto the six cardinal points of the appropriate Poincaré sphere.

    “Typically, these applications require projections of the vortex beam onto one of the 6 cardinal points on the appropriate Poincaré sphere.”
    “and each is split in the vertical direction into the six polarization channels at the cardinal points of the corresponding higher-order Poincaré sphere.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A q-plate with q = 1/2 illuminated with vertical linear polarization produces a radially polarized beam.

    “Thus, the beam impinging the system is the radially polarized beam.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A q-plate with q = 1 illuminated with vertical linear polarization produces a second-order radially polarized beam.

    “Thus, the second order radial polarization is generated as the input beam.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A q-plate with q = 1 illuminated with linear polarization oriented at 45° produces a slanted second-order vector beam.

    “Therefore, in the first case a slanted second order vector beam is generated (Fig. 6(c))”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A q-plate with q = 1 illuminated with RCP polarization produces a scalar LCP vortex beam.

    “while in the second case a scalar LCP vortex beam is generated (Fig. 6(d))”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Equation (8) uses the vertical grating for both polarizations

    Minor

    The text says the vertical and horizontal polarizations can have different diffraction amplitudes, but Equation (8) assigns Gk^v to both diagonal entries. As written, it does not represent the two independently designed gratings.

  • Zero-charge q-plate matrix is not the identity

    Minor

    The paper says Mqin-kq becomes the identity when the charges match. Its own definition instead gives M0 = diag(+1, −1), a half-wave-plate matrix; only the full product with the additional HWP in Equation (13) becomes the identity.

  • Three Jones matrices disagree with their specified grating coefficients

    Minor

    The coefficients specified in Equations (9)-(10) give vertical/horizontal diagonal entries of (−1,i)/√2 at +3, (i,−1)/√2 at +1, and (1,1)/√2 at −1. Equation (11) instead gives (1,i)/√2, (i,1)/√2, and (−1,1)/√2, respectively; these differences change the stated polarization transformations.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bazhenov, V. Yu, Vasnetsov, V. & Soskin, M. S. Laser-beams with screw dislocations in their wave-fronts. JETP Lett. 52, 429–431 (1990).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moreno, I., Davis, J. A., Badham, K., Sánchez-López, M. M., Holland, J. E., & Cottrell, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Moreno, Ignacio
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-05-22
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
2216-2216
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2615434909
Cited by
31
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1302873)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (FIS2015-66328-C3-3-R)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Keywords
vector beams, q-plate, topological charge, Poincaré sphere, higher-order Poincaré sphere, phase-only spatial light modulator, optical communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review