Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantum-optical coherence tomography with collinear entangled photons

Lopez-Mago, Dorilian, Novotny, Lukas·2012·Optics Letters

Abstract

Quantum-optical coherence tomography (QOCT) combines the principles of classical OCT with the correlation properties of entangled photon pairs [Phys. Rev. A 65, 053817 (2002)]. The standard QOCT configuration is based on the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, which uses entangled photons propagating in separate interferometer arms. This noncollinear configuration imposes practical limitations, e.g., misalignment due to drift and low signal-to-noise. Here, we introduce and implement QOCT based on collinear entangled photons. It makes use of a two-photon Michelson interferometer and offers several advantages, such as simplicity, robustness, and adaptability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.37.004077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HOM visibility has been used to characterize the level of mode indistinguishability for a wide range of single photon sources.

    “Indeed, the HOM visibility has been used to characterize the level of mode indistinguishability for a wide range of single photon sources, i.e. spontaneous parametric down-conversion [52,53], quantum dots [54][55][56][57][58], atomic vapours [59][60][61][62][63], nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond [64][65][66], trapped ions [67], trapped neutral atoms [68,69], and molecules [70,71].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Abouraddy, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 053817, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.053817 · DOI
  2. Nasr, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 083601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.083601 · DOI
  3. Nasr, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 1353, 10.1364/OPEX.12.001353 · DOI
  4. Nasr, 2009, Opt. Commun., 282, 1154, 10.1016/j.optcom.2008.11.061 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Booth, 2011, Opt. Commun., 284, 2542, 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.01.065 · DOI
  6. Erkmen, 2006, Phys. Rev. A, 74, 041601(R, 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.041601 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Teich, 2011, Quantum Inf. Process., 10, 1, 10.1007/s11128-010-0166-1 · DOI
  8. Lopez-Mago, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 86, 023820, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.023820 · DOI
  9. Ling, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 77, 043834, 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.043834 · DOI
  10. Mitchell, 2009, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 043835, 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.043835 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lopez-Mago, D., & Novotny, L.
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
37
Issue
19
Pages
4077
ISSN
  • 0146-9592
  • 1539-4794
Cited by
36
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • DOE (DE-FG02-05ER46207)
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Tecnológico de Monterrey (CAT141)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review