The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantum-optical coherence tomography with collinear entangled photons
Abstract
Quantum-optical coherence tomography (QOCT) combines the principles of classical OCT with the correlation properties of entangled photon pairs [Phys. Rev. A 65, 053817 (2002)]. The standard QOCT configuration is based on the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, which uses entangled photons propagating in separate interferometer arms. This noncollinear configuration imposes practical limitations, e.g., misalignment due to drift and low signal-to-noise. Here, we introduce and implement QOCT based on collinear entangled photons. It makes use of a two-photon Michelson interferometer and offers several advantages, such as simplicity, robustness, and adaptability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The HOM visibility has been used to characterize the level of mode indistinguishability for a wide range of single photon sources.
“Indeed, the HOM visibility has been used to characterize the level of mode indistinguishability for a wide range of single photon sources, i.e. spontaneous parametric down-conversion [52,53], quantum dots [54][55][56][57][58], atomic vapours [59][60][61][62][63], nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond [64][65][66], trapped ions [67], trapped neutral atoms [68,69], and molecules [70,71].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Abouraddy, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 053817, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.053817 · DOI
- Nasr, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 083601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.083601 · DOI
- Nasr, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 1353, 10.1364/OPEX.12.001353 · DOI
- Nasr, 2009, Opt. Commun., 282, 1154, 10.1016/j.optcom.2008.11.061 · DOI · Paper page
- Booth, 2011, Opt. Commun., 284, 2542, 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.01.065 · DOI
- Erkmen, 2006, Phys. Rev. A, 74, 041601(R, 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.041601 · DOI · Paper page
- Teich, 2011, Quantum Inf. Process., 10, 1, 10.1007/s11128-010-0166-1 · DOI
- Lopez-Mago, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 86, 023820, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.023820 · DOI
- Ling, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 77, 043834, 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.043834 · DOI
- Mitchell, 2009, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 043835, 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.043835 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez-Mago, D., & Novotny, L.
- Venue
- Optics Letters
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2012-09-25
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4077
- ISSN
- 0146-9592
- 1539-4794
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- DOE (DE-FG02-05ER46207)
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
- Tecnológico de Monterrey (CAT141)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review