CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Optical Systems and Laser TechnologyOptical and Acousto-Optic TechnologiesPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of disparate laser beam deflection technologies by means of number and rate of resolvable spots

Bechtold, Peter, Hohenstein, Ralph, Schmidt, Michael·2013·Optics Letters
DOI 10.1364/ol.38.002934
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We introduce a method to objectively evaluate systems of differing beam deflection technologies that commonly are described by disparate technical specifications. Using our new approach based on resolvable spots we will compare commercially available random-access beam deflection technologies, namely galvanometer scanners, piezo scanners, MEMS scanners, acousto-optic deflectors, and electro-optic deflectors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.38.002934

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bruening, 2011, Phys. Procedia, 12, 105, 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.112 · DOI
  2. Russbueldt, 2010, Opt. Lett., 35, 4169, 10.1364/OL.35.004169 · DOI
  3. Iyer, 2005, J. Neurophysiol., 95, 535, 10.1152/jn.00865.2005 · DOI
  4. Kirkby, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, 13720, 10.1364/OE.18.013720 · DOI
  5. Urey, 2004, Appl. Opt., 43, 620, 10.1364/AO.43.000620 · DOI
  6. Chang, 1976, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason., 23, 2, 10.1109/T-SU.1976.30835 · DOI
  7. Bechtold, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 14627, 10.1364/OE.21.014627 · DOI
  8. Ngoi, 2001, Opt. Express, 9, 200, 10.1364/OE.9.000200 · DOI
  9. Bechtold, 2012, Phys. Procedia, 39, 683, 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.089 · DOI
  10. Nakamura, 2008, J. Appl. Phys., 104, 13105, 10.1063/1.2949394 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Bechtold, P., Hohenstein, R., & Schmidt, M.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
ORCID
Schmidt, Michael
Venue
Optics Letters
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2013-08-02
Volume
38
Issue
16
Pages
2934
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
DOI
10.1364/ol.38.002934
OpenAlex
W2125133434
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Optics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation (DFG)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Systems and Laser Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Keywords
laser beam deflection, galvanometer scanner, MEMS scanner, acousto-optic deflector, electro-optic deflector
MeSH terms
Lasers, Optical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of disparate laser beam deflection technologies by means of number and rate of resolvable spots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ol.38.002934
The paper
Bechtold, P., Hohenstein, R., & Schmidt, M. (2013). Evaluation of disparate laser beam deflection technologies by means of number and rate of resolvable spots. Optics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.38.002934