Cited by 293Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCorneal surgery and disordersSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research

Second harmonic generation imaging of collagen fibrils in cornea and sclera

Open access
Han, Meng, Giese, Günter, Bille, Josef F.·2005·Optics Express

Abstract

Collagen, as the most abundant protein in the human body, determines the unique physiological and optical properties of the connective tissues including cornea and sclera. The ultrastructure of collagen, which conventionally can only be resolved by electron microscopy, now can be probed by optical second harmonic generation (SHG) imaging. SHG imaging revealed that corneal collagen fibrils are regularly packed as a polycrystalline lattice, accounting for the transparency of cornea. In contrast, scleral fibrils possess inhomogeneous, tubelike structures with thin hard shells, maintaining the high stiffness and elasticity of the sclera.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/opex.13.005791

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Second harmonic generation imaging can provide qualitative and quantitative information about lamellar organisation within the cornea and has the potential to be used in vivo.

    “Over the last decade there has been an upsurge in the use of non-linear microscopy, in particular second harmonic generation imaging, to provide qualitative (Han et al., 2005, Morishige et al., 2006, Teng et al., 2006, Bueno et al., 2011) and quantitative (Mega et al., 2012, Tuer et al., 2012, Ghazaryan et al., 2013) information about the lamellar organisation within the cornea, a technique that,”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Han et al., 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, M., Giese, G., & Bille, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2005
Volume
13
Issue
15
Pages
5791
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974350661
Cited by
293
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
collagen fibrils, second harmonic generation microscopy, cornea, sclera, collagen ultrastructure, corneal transparency, scleral stiffness, connective tissue biomechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review