Cited by 42Photonic and Optical DevicesAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesMechanical and Optical Resonators

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Wafer-level hermetically sealed silicon photonic MEMS

Open access

Abstract

The emerging fields of silicon (Si) photonic micro–electromechanical systems (MEMS) and optomechanics enable a wide range of novel high-performance photonic devices with ultra-low power consumption, such as integrated optical MEMS phase shifters, tunable couplers, switches, and optomechanical resonators. In contrast to conventional SiO 2 -clad Si photonics, photonic MEMS and optomechanics have suspended and movable parts that need to be protected from environmental influence and contamination during operation. Wafer-level hermetic sealing can be a cost-efficient solution, but Si photonic MEMS that are hermetically sealed inside cavities with optical and electrical feedthroughs have not been demonstrated to date, to our knowledge. Here, we demonstrate wafer-level vacuum sealing of Si photonic MEMS inside cavities with ultra-thin caps featuring optical and electrical feedthroughs that connect the photonic MEMS on the inside to optical grating couplers and electrical bond pads on the outside. We used Si photonic MEMS devices built on foundry wafers from the iSiPP50G Si photonics platform of IMEC, Belgium. Vacuum confinement inside the sealed cavities was confirmed by an observed increase of the cutoff frequency of the electro-mechanical response of the encapsulated photonic MEMS phase shifters, due to reduction of air damping. The sealing caps are extremely thin, have a small footprint, and are compatible with subsequent flip-chip bonding onto interposers or printed circuit boards. Thus, our approach for sealing of integrated Si photonic MEMS clears a significant hurdle for their application in high-performance Si photonic circuits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/prj.441215

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors developed a platform for wafer-level hermetic sealing of silicon photonic MEMS by wafer bonding.

    “Therefore, we have developed a platform for wafer-level hermetic sealing of silicon photonic MEMS by wafer bonding64.”

    From Integrated silicon photonic MEMS (2023) · cites this paper as [64]

  • Challenges such as hermetic sealing with optical and electrical feedthroughs are solvable.

    “Challenges such as hermetic sealing with optical and electrical feedthroughs are solvable88,89.”

    From Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics (2024) · cites this paper as [89]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 42

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sattari, 2021, Low-voltage silicon photonic MEMS switch with vertical actuation, 298
  2. Xia, 2020, Evaluation of silicon diaphragms for hermetic packaging of microbolometer arrays, 1
  3. John, 2016, 3D IC Integration and Packaging

Metadata

Authors
Jo, G., Edinger, P., Bleiker, S. J., Wang, X., Takabayashi, A. Y., Sattari, H., Quack, N., Jezzini, M., Lee, J. S., Verheyen, P., Zand, I., Khan, U., Bogaerts, W., Stemme, G., Gylfason, K. B., & Niklaus, F.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Tyndall National Institute (IE)
  • IMEC (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Photonics Research
Published
2022-01-14
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
A14
ISSN
2327-9125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3216578717
Cited by
42
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Photonics Research (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
H2020 Industrial Leadership (101017186 (AEOLUS), 780283 (MORPHIC), 825272 (ULISSES), 871740 (ZeroAMP))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
Keywords
vacuum encapsulation, electrical feedthrough, MEMS phase shifter, optomechanics, air damping, flip-chip bonding, tunable coupler, silicon photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review