CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polarization oscillating beams constructed by copropagating optical frozen waves

Li, Peng, Wu, Dongjing, Zhang, Yi, Liu, Sheng, Li, Yu, Qi, Shuxia, Zhao, Jianlin·2018·Photonics Research
DOI 10.1364/prj.6.000756
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Polarization oscillating beams, namely, polarization standing waves, commonly formed by a pair of coherent counterpropagating light waves with orthogonal polarizations, oscillate their states of polarization periodically within a wavelength interval, offering conceptual and practical interests in light-matter interactions such as the nonreciprocal magnetoelectric effect, and impressive applications in optical imaging, sensing, and chirality detection. Here, we propose a new class of polarization oscillating beams that longitudinally vary states of polarization with spatial intervals within centimeters via the superposition of two copropagating optical frozen waves with preshaped longitudinal intensity profiles and transverse phase structures. The flexibility and manipulability are demonstrated by creating several polarization oscillating beams with different polarization structures. This work paves a new way to manipulate other waves and may be useful for applications of optical standing waves in optical manipulation, light guiding of atoms, polarization-sensitive sensing, etc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/prj.6.000756

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Barron, 1972, Nature, 238, 17, 10.1038/238017a0 · DOI
  2. Fang, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 31141, 10.1038/srep31141 · DOI
  3. Bliokh, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 033601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.033601 · DOI
  4. Plum, 2017, ACS Photon., 4, 3000, 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00921 · DOI
  5. Bliokh, 2015, Phys. Rep., 592, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Smorenburg, 2011, Phys. Rev. A, 83, 063810, 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.063810 · DOI
  7. Everett, 2016, Nat. Phys., 13, 68, 10.1038/nphys3901 · DOI
  8. Yang, 2009, Nano Today, 4, 269, 10.1016/j.nantod.2009.05.001 · DOI
  9. Tang, 2011, Science, 332, 333, 10.1126/science.1202817 · DOI
  10. Kang, 2017, ACS Photon., 4, 1298, 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00057 · DOI
  11. Li, 2016, Opt. Lett., 41, 4811, 10.1364/OL.41.004811 · DOI
  12. Cardano, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 8815, 10.1364/OE.21.008815 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Moreno, 2015, Opt. Lett., 40, 5451, 10.1364/OL.40.005451 · DOI
  14. Davis, 2016, Opt. Lett., 41, 2270, 10.1364/OL.41.002270 · DOI
  15. Fu, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 30765, 10.1038/srep30765 · DOI
  16. Li, 2017, Opt. Express, 25, 5821, 10.1364/OE.25.005821 · DOI
  17. Zamnoni-Rached, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 4001, 10.1364/OPEX.12.004001 · DOI
  18. Vieira, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 2034, 10.1364/OL.37.002034 · DOI
  19. Vieira, 2015, Opt. Lett., 40, 5834, 10.1364/OL.40.005834 · DOI
  20. Liu, 2017, Photon. Res., 5, 15, 10.1364/PRJ.5.000015 · DOI
  21. Wang, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 3549, 10.1364/OL.32.003549 · DOI
  22. Wang, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, 10786, 10.1364/OE.18.010786 · DOI
  23. Wang, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 253602, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.253602 · DOI
  24. Durnin, 1987, Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, 1499, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1499 · DOI
  25. Li, 2016, Opt. Lett., 41, 2205, 10.1364/OL.41.002205 · DOI
  26. Čižmár, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 15558, 10.1364/OE.17.015558 · DOI
  27. Chen, 2017, ACS Photon., 4, 1333, 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00263 · DOI
  28. Marrucci, 2006, Appl. Phys. Lett., 88, 221102, 10.1063/1.2207993 · DOI
  29. Marrucci, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 163905, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Glybovski, 2016, Phys. Rep., 634, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.004 · DOI
  31. Zhang, 2016, Adv. Opt. Mater., 4, 818, 10.1002/adom.201500690 · DOI
  32. Yu, 2014, Nat. Mater., 13, 139, 10.1038/nmat3839 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Shu, 2017, Photon. Res., 5, 64, 10.1364/PRJ.5.000064 · DOI
  34. Ke, 2016, Appl. Phys. Lett., 108, 101102, 10.1063/1.4943403 · DOI
  35. Biener, 2006, Opt. Lett., 31, 1594, 10.1364/OL.31.001594 · DOI
  36. Zhang, 2017, ACS Nano, 11, 4292, 10.1021/acsnano.7b01428 · DOI
  37. Liu, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 2416, 10.1364/OL.38.002416 · DOI
  38. Liu, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 20774, 10.1038/srep20774 · DOI
  39. Aleksanyan, 2016, Optica, 3, 167, 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000167 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Li, P., Wu, D., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Li, Y., Qi, S., & Zhao, J.
Venue
Photonics Research
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2018-06-27
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
756
ISSN
2327-9125
DOI
10.1364/prj.6.000756
Cited by
41
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (11634010, 11774289, 61377035, 61675168)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0303800)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3102018zy036)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review