Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Generation and dynamics of optical beams with polarization singularities

Cardano, Filippo, Karimi, Ebrahim, Marrucci, Lorenzo, de Lisio, Corrado, Santamato, Enrico·2013·Optics Express

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.21.008815

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bloch, Néel, and anti type skyrmionic beams are Poincaré beams with lemon and star structured polarization patterns, achievable as a superposition of a vortex eigenmode and a non-vortex eigenmode with orthogonal polarizations.

    “Since 2D optical skyrmions are special vector projection textures from S 2 Poincaré sphere to R 2 plane, as shown in Figs.1(a), Bloch, Néel, and anti type skyrmionic beams are Poincaré beams with lemon and star structured polarization patterns 47 , which can be achieved as a superposition of a vortex eigenmode and a non-vortex eigenmode with orthogonal polarizations.”

    From Topological state and number transitions of optical skyrmions upon free-space beam propagation (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Introduction identifies these polarization-singular beams as also called Poincaré beams, and the Conclusion describes lemon and star polarization patterns. Section 2 describes their construction from orthogonally polarized Laguerre–Gauss modes with zero and nonzero orbital angular momentum. The paper does not identify the beams or patterns as Bloch, Néel, or anti-type skyrmions, so that classification is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Nye, 1974, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 336, 165, 10.1098/rspa.1974.0012 · DOI
  2. Dennis, 2009, Prog. Opt., 53, 293, 10.1016/S0079-6638(08)00205-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Franke-Arnold, 2008, Laser Photonics Rev., 2, 299, 10.1002/lpor.200810007 · DOI
  4. Nye, 1983, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 387, 105, 10.1098/rspa.1983.0053 · DOI
  5. Nye, 1983, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 389, 279, 10.1098/rspa.1983.0109 · DOI
  6. Dennis, 2002, Opt. Commun., 213, 201, 10.1016/S0030-4018(02)02088-6 · DOI
  7. Freund, 2001, Opt. Commun., 199, 47, 10.1016/S0030-4018(01)01533-4 · DOI
  8. Angelsky, 2002, Opt. Commun., 207, 57, 10.1016/S0030-4018(02)01479-7 · DOI
  9. Berry, 2004, New J. Phys., 6, 162, 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/162 · DOI
  10. Soskin, 2003, Opt. Lett., 28, 1475, 10.1364/OL.28.001475 · DOI
  11. Beckley, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, 10777, 10.1364/OE.18.010777 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Galvez, 2012, Appl. Opt., 51, 2925, 10.1364/AO.51.002925 · DOI
  13. Kurzynowski, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 26755, 10.1364/OE.20.026755 · DOI
  14. Fadeyeva, 2012, Appl. Opt., 51, C224, 10.1364/AO.51.00C224 · DOI
  15. Marrucci, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 163905, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Cardano, 2012, Appl. Opt., 51, C1, 10.1364/AO.51.0000C1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Marrucci, 2011, J. Opt., 13, 064001, 10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064001 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Karimi, 2009, Appl. Phys. Lett., 94, 231124, 10.1063/1.3154549 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Slussarenko, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 4085, 10.1364/OE.19.004085 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Karimi, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 3053, 10.1364/OL.32.003053 · DOI
  21. Karimi, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 1225, 10.1364/OL.34.001225 · DOI
  22. Hnatovsky, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 123901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.123901 · DOI
  23. Ambrosio, 2012, Nat. Commun., 3, 989, 10.1038/ncomms1996 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cardano, F., Karimi, E., Marrucci, L., de Lisio, C., & Santamato, E.
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2013-04-03
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
8815
ISSN
1094-4087
Cited by
182
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review