Optimization of Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction of Irganox 1010 and Irgafos 168 from Polyolefins Before Liquid Chromatographic Analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A step-by-step approach and an experimental design achieved similar values for extraction of Irganox 1010 and Irgafos 168 from polyolefin polymers.
“Once more, a step-by-step approach and an experimental design were used to obtain experimental conditions, achieving similar values in both cases.”
From Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes (2010) · cites this paper as [62]
Efficient experimental design methodologies have also been carried out for extraction parameter optimization in some works in Table 4, but to a lesser extent.
“however, efficient experimental design methodologies have also been carried out, but to a lesser extent [10,62,63,84,90,97].”
From Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes (2010) · cites this paper as [62]
Endocrine disrupters, antioxidants, PAHs and other organic compounds of different natures have been analyzed by DLLME, IL-DLLME and DLLME-SFO.
“Endocrine disrupters [10,18,57,59,80-83], antioxidants [62,84], PAHs [9,11,66,67,85,86] and other organic compounds of different natures [7,8,63, 87-104] have been analyzed by DLLME, IL-DLLME and DLLME-SFO.”
From Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes (2010) · cites this paper as [62]
Cites
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Rezaee, M., Assadi, Y., Milani Hosseini, M.-R., Aghaee, E., Ahmadi, F., & Berijani, S. (2006) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.007 · Cited by 3,402 · see citing works
Fattahi, N., Samadi, S., Assadi, Y., & Hosseini, M. R. M. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.002 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method
Rezaee, M., Yamini, Y., & Faraji, M. (2010) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.088 · Cited by 971 · see citing works
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organic analytes
Herrera-Herrera, A. V., Asensio-Ramos, M., Hernández-Borges, J., & Rodríguez-Delgado, M. Á. (2010) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2010.03.016 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Ten years of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and derived techniques
Campillo, N., Viñas, P., Šandrejová, J., & Andruch, V. (2017) · Applied Spectroscopy Reviews · doi:10.1080/05704928.2016.1224240 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- Farajzadeh, M. A., Vardast, M. R., & Bahram, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Tabriz (IR)
- Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
- Urmia University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Farajzadeh, Mir Ali
- Venue
- Chromatographia
- Published
- 2008-12-11
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 409-419
- ISSN
- 0009-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1612-1112
- OpenAlex
- W2109460620
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chromatographia (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Keywords
- dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, Irganox 1010, Irgafos 168, antioxidants, polyolefins, carbon tetrachloride, acetonitrile, extraction optimization, response surface methodology, central composite design, extraction recovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review