The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Agitation Modules: Flexible Means to Accelerate Automated Freeze Substitution
Abstract
For ultrafast fixation of biological samples to avoid artifacts, high-pressure freezing (HPF) followed by freeze substitution (FS) is preferred over chemical fixation at room temperature. After HPF, samples are maintained at low temperature during dehydration and fixation, while avoiding damaging recrystallization. This is a notoriously slow process. McDonald and Webb demonstrated, in 2011, that sample agitation during FS dramatically reduces the necessary time. Then, in 2015, we (H.G. and S.R.) introduced an agitation module into the cryochamber of an automated FS unit and demonstrated that the preparation of algae could be shortened from days to a couple of hours. We argued that variability in the processing, reproducibility, and safety issues are better addressed using automated FS units. For dissemination, we started low-cost manufacturing of agitation modules for two of the most widely used FS units, the Automatic Freeze Substitution Systems, AFS(1) and AFS2, from Leica Microsystems, using three dimensional (3D)-printing of the major components. To test them, several labs independently used the modules on a wide variety of specimens that had previously been processed by manual agitation, or without agitation. We demonstrate that automated processing with sample agitation saves time, increases flexibility with respect to sample requirements and protocols, and produces data of at least as good quality as other approaches.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some of the hurdles linked to ultrathin section preparation can be overcome by using focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) technology”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [152]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 10.1007/978-3-642-72815-0_7 · DOI
- Humbel BM, 1989, Immuno-gold labeling in cell biology
- Humbel BM. Freeze substitution. In: Cavalier A, Spehner D, Humbel BM, editors. Hand book of cryo-preparation methods for electron microscopy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. p. 319–41.
- Cavalier A, Spehner D, Humbel BM. Handbook of cryo-preparation methods for electron microscopy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. · DOI
- 10.1002/jemt.1098 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0968-4328(01)00037-3 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01237.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01767.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S1431927613004790 · DOI
- 10.1017/S143192761005765X · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03526.x · DOI · Paper page
- Bobik K, 2014, J Vis Exp, 92, e51844
- 10.1083/jcb.201405081 · DOI
- 10.1038/ismej.2015.253 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e16-02-0099 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1431927613008702 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.protis.2016.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-6352-2_15 · DOI
- Kaech A., 2009, Handbook of cryo-preparation methods for electron microscopy
- 10.1083/jcb.25.2.407 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01122-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2014.099 · DOI · Paper page
- Siksou L, Rostaing P, Lechaire JP, Boudier T, Ohtsuka T, Fejtová A, Kao HT, Greengard P, Gundelfinger ED, Triller A, Marty S. Three-dimensional architecture of presynaptic terminal cytomatrix. J Neurosci. 2007;27(26):6868–77. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0091-679X(10)96020-2 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01064.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.01984.x · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.82.3.787 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.007773 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04388.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00063-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.08.006 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00182.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0086383 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-0270(97)00061-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00709-013-0575-y · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000749 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.010517 · DOI
- 10.1093/jxb/ert151 · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/mcu042 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2015.01018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1002/jemt.20451 · DOI
- 10.1002/jemt.20371 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0020187 · DOI
- 10.1042/BJ20121259 · DOI
- MacKay EM, 1932, J Biol Chem, 96, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)76276-5 · DOI
- Brittain T, 1978, Biochim Biophys Acta, 543
- 10.1007/s00421-015-3175-z · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1985.tb02658.x · DOI
- Humbel B, 1985, The science of biological specimen preparation
- 10.1017/S1431927613013846 · DOI
- 10.7717/peerj.3923 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01238.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.09.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41396-018-0069-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reipert, S., Goldammer, H., Richardson, C., Goldberg, M. W., Hawkins, T. J., Hollergschwandtner, E., Kaufmann, W. A., Antreich, S., & Stierhof, Y.-D.
- Affiliations
- Core Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
- Electron Microscopy Facility, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
- Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), Microscopy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-07-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 903-921
- ISSN
- 0022-1554
- 1551-5044
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1101)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK (BB/G011818/1, BB/E015735/1)
- Austria Wirtschaftsservice (P1404884)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review