Cited by 36Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Shifting Implementation Science Theory to Empower Primary Care Practices

Open access
Miller, William L., Rubinstein, Ellen B., Howard, Jenna, Crabtree, Benjamin F.·2019·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

Observers of the past 10 to 15 years have witnessed the simultaneous growth of dramatic changes in the practice of primary care and the emergence of a new field of dissemination and implementation science (D&I). Most current implementation science research in primary care assumes practices are not meeting externally derived standards and need external support to meet these demands. After a decade of initiatives, many stakeholders now question the return on their investments. Overall improvements in quality metrics, utilization cost savings, and patient experience have been less than anticipated. While recently conducting a research project in primary care practices, we unexpectedly discovered 3 practices that profoundly shifted our thinking about the sources and directionality of practice change and the underlying assumptions of D&I. Inspired by these practices—along with systems thinking, complexity theory, action research, and the collaborative approaches of community-based participatory research—we propose a reimagining of D&I theory to empower practices. We shift the emphasis regarding the source and direction of change from outside-in to inside-out. Such a shift has the potential to open a new frontier in the science of dissemination and implementation and inform better health policy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.2353

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Involving stakeholders in defining local health system needs and selecting EBP(s) and/or implementation strategies enhances their collaboration and ownership of the implementation effort.

    “having them involved in defining the local health system needs and selecting EBP(s) and/or implementation strategies in the EPIS implementation phase, as these are important to enhance their collaboration and ownership of the implementation effort [26].”
  • Stakeholder engagement is an integral component of implementation.

    “Stakeholder engagement is an integral component of implementation [25, 26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pink DH. Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us. New York, NY: Penguin; 2011.
  2. Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism, Perseptive and Method. Engle- wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc; 1969.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, W. L., Rubinstein, E. B., Howard, J., & Crabtree, B. F.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • North Dakota State University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2019-05
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
250-256
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2945692682
Cited by
36
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA176545)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
dissemination and implementation research, primary care practices, practice change, empowerment, systems thinking, complexity theory, action research, community-based participatory research, health policy, quality improvement
MeSH terms
Implementation Science, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Qualitative Research, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review