Cited by 62Reproductive Health and ContraceptionHealth Policy Implementation ScienceEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perspectives Among Canadian Physicians on Factors Influencing Implementation of Mifepristone Medical Abortion: A National Qualitative Study

Open access
Munro, Sarah, Guilbert, Edith, Wagner, Marie-Soleil, Wilcox, Elizabeth S., Devane, Courtney, Dunn, Sheila, Brooks, Melissa, Soon, Judith A., Mills, Megan, Leduc-Robert, Genevieve, Wahl, Kate, Zannier, Erik, Norman, Wendy V.·2020·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: Access to family planning health services in Canada has been historically inadequate and inequitable. A potential solution appeared when Health Canada approved mifepristone, the gold standard for medical abortion, in July 2015. We sought to investigate the factors that influence successful initiation and ongoing provision of medical abortion services among Canadian health professionals and how these factors relate to abortion policies, systems, and service access throughout Canada. METHODS: We conducted 1-on-1 semistructured interviews with a national sample of abortion-providing and nonproviding physicians and health system stakeholders in Canadian health care settings. Our data collection, thematic analysis, and interpretation were guided by Diffusion of Innovation theory. RESULTS: We conducted interviews with 90 participants including rural practitioners and those with no previous abortion experience. In the course of our study, Health Canada removed mifepristone restrictions. Our results suggest that Health Canada's initial restrictions discouraged physicians from providing mifepristone and were inconsistent with provincial licensing standards, thereby limiting patient access. Once deregulated, remaining factors were primarily related to local and regional implementation processes. Participants held strong perceptions that mifepristone was the new standard of care for medical abortion in Canada and within the scope of primary care practice. CONCLUSION: Health Canada's removal of mifepristone restrictions facilitated the implementation of abortion care in the primary care setting. Our results are unique because Canada is the first country to facilitate provision of medical abortion in primary care via evidence-based deregulation of mifepristone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.2562

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 2012 Canadian Abortion Provider Survey found the proportion of surgical abortions was 96.2%.

    “Our 2012 Canadian Abortion Provider Survey (CAPS) found the proportion of surgical abortions was 96.2%.”

    From First and Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion Providers and Services in 2019: Results From the Canadian Abortion Provider Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that abortion services in Canada before 2017 were surgical, and the References list a report of a 2012 national survey. Our copy does not give the claimed 96.2% figure, so it supports the general point but not the specific proportion. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the 2012 CAPS, fewer than 300 physicians responded indicating they were providers of abortion care in Canada.

    “Fewer than 300 physicians responded indicating they were providers of abortion care in Canada”

    From First and Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion Providers and Services in 2019: Results From the Canadian Abortion Provider Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction states that before 2017, fewer than 300 doctors provided surgical abortion services in Canada, citing a 2012 national survey. It does not say that fewer than 300 physicians responded to that survey or identified themselves as providers in their responses. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the 2012 CAPS, abortion access was limited in rural areas.

    “while abortion access was limited in rural areas”

    From First and Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion Providers and Services in 2019: Results From the Canadian Abortion Provider Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that before 2017, abortion services were concentrated in urban facilities and patients outside large cities had to travel significant distances. This supports limited rural access, but the paper does not identify that finding as a result of the 2012 CAPS; it describes CAPS elsewhere as a provider-support platform. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the 2012 CAPS, providers mostly practiced in high-volume specialized clinics concentrated in the largest urban areas.

    “they mostly practiced in high-volume specialized clinics concentrated in the largest urban areas”

    From First and Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion Providers and Services in 2019: Results From the Canadian Abortion Provider Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that before 2017, fewer than 300 doctors provided surgical abortion at roughly 100 facilities in urban cities near the Canada–US border, citing a 2012 national survey. That supports an urban concentration of services, but the paper does not say that providers mostly practiced in high-volume specialized clinics or that those clinics were in the largest urban areas. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite the unanticipated impact of COVID-19, we recruited more providers than in our 2012 survey.

    “Despite the unanticipated impact of COVID-19, we recruited more providers than in our 2012 survey.3”

    From First and Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion Providers and Services in 2019: Results From the Canadian Abortion Provider Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Recruitment and Data Collection sections describe a 2017 survey and interviews conducted in 2017–2018. A search of our copy for a 2012 survey and COVID-19 found no passage comparing provider recruitment across those surveys or assessing a pandemic impact. No page numbers were provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Munro, S., Guilbert, E., Wagner, M.-S., Wilcox, E. S., Devane, C., Dunn, S., Brooks, M., Soon, J. A., Mills, M., Leduc-Robert, G., Wahl, K., Zannier, E., & Norman, W. V.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2020-09
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
413-421
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W3085209431
Cited by
61
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC (16603, 18270, 16743, 18270, 16603)
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
  • Association des pharmaciens du Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (18270, PHE148161, CPP-329455-107837)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
mifepristone, abortion pills, physician attitudes, abortion policy, diffusion of innovation theory, family planning access, rural physicians, Canada
MeSH terms
Abortion, Legal, Attitude of Health Personnel, Canada, Female, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Physicians, Pregnancy, Primary Health Care, Mifepristone, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review