Cited by 51Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Watchful Waiting on Satisfaction and Anxiety Among Patients Seeking Care for Unexplained Complaints

Open access
van Bokhoven, M. A., Koch, H., van der Weijden, T., Grol, R. P. T. M., Kester, A. D., Rinkens, P. E. L. M., Bindels, P. J. E., Dinant, G.-J.·2009·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

Background/aims Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are used in sports medicine and have been the subject of increased clinical interest. However, there have been very few reports of the composition of initial whole blood and the final PRP product. The objective of this study was to provide technical tools to perform a correct characterisation of platelets, leucocytes and red blood cells (RBCs) from whole blood and PRP. Methods Blood and PRP were obtained from 26 healthy volunteers and prepared according to the varying parameters encountered within PRP process preparation and quantification (harvesting method, anticoagulant used, sampling method, counting method). Concentrations were measured at t=0, t=1, t=6 and t=24 hours. Results Sampling of blood in Eppendorf tubes significantly decreased platelet concentration over time, whereas sampling in Microvette EDTA-coated tube kept platelet concentration stable until 24 hours. A non-significant difference was observed in platelet counts in PRP with impedance (median (IQR): 521.8 G/L (505.3–524.7)) and fluorescence (591.5 G/L (581.5–595.8)) methods. Other studied parameters did not influence platelet concentrations in blood or PRP samples. Leucocytes and RBC counts were similar whatever the anticoagulant, sampling, harvesting and counting methods used for both blood and PRP samples. Conclusions Systematic sampling of blood and PRP in EDTA-coated tubes for quality control is recommended. The use of a validated counter for PRP sample should also be taken into account.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.958

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Dinant G-J, van Wijk MAM, Janssens HJEM, et al. NHG-standaard bloedonderzoek. Algemene principes en uitvoering in eigen beheer [Dutch College of General Practitioners guideline "Blood testing." General principles and use under direct management]. Huisarts Wet. 1994;37(5):202-211.
  2. Stalenhoef JGA. Resultaten NIPO-enquête 2006: Wat vinden huis- artsen en patiënten van elkaar? Huisarts Wet. 2007;50(1):5.
  3. Suchman AL, Roter D, Green M, Lipkin M Jr. Physician satisfac- tion with primary care offi ce visits. The Collaborative Study Group of the American Academy on Physician and Patient. Med Care. 1993;31(12):1083-1092.
  4. Koch H, Van Bokhoven MA, Ter Riet G-J, Van der Weijden T, Dinant GJ, Bindels P. The course of unexplained complaints in general prac- tice. J Psychosom Res. 2006;61(3):419.
  5. Stalenhoef JGA. Vragen over preventie in de NHG-enquêtes 1999 [Questions about prevention in the questionnaires of the Dutch College of General Practitioners 1999]. Huisarts Wet. 2000;43(4):196-197.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van Bokhoven, M. A., Koch, H., van der Weijden, T., Grol, R. P. T. M., Kester, A. D., Rinkens, P. E. L. M., Bindels, P. J. E., & Dinant, G.-J.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2009-03-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
112-120
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2153358256
Cited by
51
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
expectant management, patient satisfaction, anxiety, platelet-rich plasma, PRP preparation, platelet count, blood sampling, quality control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review