Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments

Open access
Ferraro, Paul J, Pattanayak, Subhrendu K·2006·PLoS Biology

Abstract

DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Pullin, 2001, Conserv Biol, 15, 50, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99499.x · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99499.x · Paper page
  2. Kleijn, 2003, Appl Econ Lett, 40, 947
  3. Langholz, 2000, Ecol Econ, 33, 173, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00141-X · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00141-x

Cited by

See all 1,312

Metadata

Authors
Ferraro, P. J., & Pattanayak, S. K.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2006-04-11
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e105
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2027133828
Cited by
1,312
References
24
FWCI
45.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105
The paper
Ferraro, P. J., & Pattanayak, S. K. (2006). Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.