CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 892

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Integrating economic costs into conservation planning

NAIDOO, R, BALMFORD, A, FERRARO, P, POLASKY, S, RICKETTS, T, ROUGET, M·2006·Trends in Ecology & Evolution
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent studies that incorporate the spatial distributions of biological benefits and economic costs in conservation planning have shown that limited budgets can achieve substantially larger biological gains than when planning ignores costs. Despite concern from donors about the effectiveness of conservation interventions, these increases in efficiency from incorporating costs into planning have not yet been widely recognized. Here, we focus on what these costs are, why they are important to consider, how they can be quantified and the benefits of their inclusion in priority setting. The most recent work in the field has examined the degree to which dynamics and threat affect the outcomes of conservation planning. We assess how costs fit into this new framework and consider prospects for integrating them into conservation planning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is equally important to consider the economic cost of the limitations imposed by conservation constraints, as the purpose of conservation planning is to efficiently achieve conservation objectives with limited resources.

    “It is equally important to consider the economic cost of the limitations imposed by conservation constraints, as the purpose of conservation planning is to efficiently achieve conservation objectives with limited resources (Naidoo et al. 2006).”

    From Maximizing species conservation in continental E cuador: a case of systematic conservation planning for biodiverse regions (2014) · cites this paper as Naidoo et al. 2006

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
NAIDOO, R., BALMFORD, A., FERRARO, P., POLASKY, S., RICKETTS, T., & ROUGET, M.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
681-687
ISSN
0169-5347
DOI
10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003
Cited by
892
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review