The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deletion of Ultraconserved Elements Yields Viable Mice
Open accessAbstract
Ultraconserved elements have been suggested to retain extended perfect sequence identity between the human, mouse, and rat genomes due to essential functional properties. To investigate the necessities of these elements in vivo, we removed four noncoding ultraconserved elements (ranging in length from 222 to 731 base pairs) from the mouse genome. To maximize the likelihood of observing a phenotype, we chose to delete elements that function as enhancers in a mouse transgenic assay and that are near genes that exhibit marked phenotypes both when completely inactivated in the mouse and when their expression is altered due to other genomic modifications. Remarkably, all four resulting lines of mice lacking these ultraconserved elements were viable and fertile, and failed to reveal any critical abnormalities when assayed for a variety of phenotypes including growth, longevity, pathology, and metabolism. In addition, more targeted screens, informed by the abnormalities observed in mice in which genes in proximity to the investigated elements had been altered, also failed to reveal notable abnormalities. These results, while not inclusive of all the possible phenotypic impact of the deleted sequences, indicate that extreme sequence constraint does not necessarily reflect crucial functions required for viability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells
Bernstein, B. E., Mikkelsen, T. S., Xie, X., Kamal, M., Huebert, D. J., Cuff, J., Fry, B., Meissner, A., Wernig, M., Plath, K., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041 · Cited by 5,361
Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome
Bejerano, G., Pheasant, M., Makunin, I., Stephen, S., Kent, W. J., Mattick, J. S., & Haussler, D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098119 · Cited by 1,732
In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences
Pennacchio, L. A., Ahituv, N., Moses, A. M., Prabhakar, S., Nobrega, M. A., Shoukry, M., Minovitsky, S., Dubchak, I., Holt, A., Lewis, K. D., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05295 · Cited by 1,165
Self-citationSherr, E. H. (2003) · Current Opinion in Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/00008480-200312000-00004 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder
Ng, S. B., Buckingham, K. J., Lee, C., Bigham, A. W., Tabor, H. K., Dent, K. M., Huff, C. D., Shannon, P. T., Jabs, E. W., Nickerson, D. A., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.499 · Cited by 1,957
Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits
Chuong, E. B., Elde, N. C., & Feschotte, C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.139 · Cited by 1,489
Genomic views of distant-acting enhancers
Visel, A., Rubin, E. M., & Pennacchio, L. A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08451 · Cited by 610
Self-citationTopology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes
de Laat, W., & Duboule, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12753 · Cited by 521
An encyclopedia of mouse DNA elements (Mouse ENCODE)
Mouse ENCODE Consortium, Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., Snyder, M., Hardison, R., Ren, B., Gingeras, T., Gilbert, D. M., Groudine, M., Bender, M., Kaul, R., et al. (2012) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-418 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahituv, N., Zhu, Y., Visel, A., Holt, A., Afzal, V., Pennacchio, L. A., & Rubin, E. M.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-09-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e234
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2129509542
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deletion of Ultraconserved Elements Yields Viable Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050234
- The paper
- Ahituv, N., Zhu, Y., Visel, A., Holt, A., Afzal, V., Pennacchio, L. A., & Rubin, E. M. (2007). Deletion of Ultraconserved Elements Yields Viable Mice. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050234
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.