Cited by 610Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Genomic views of distant-acting enhancers

Open access
Visel, Axel, Rubin, Edward M., Pennacchio, Len A.·2009·Nature

Abstract

In contrast to protein-coding sequences, the significance of variation in non-coding DNA in human disease has been minimally explored. A great number of recent genome-wide association studies suggest that non-coding variation is a significant risk factor for common disorders, but the mechanisms by which this variation contributes to disease remain largely obscure. Distant-acting transcriptional enhancers--a major category of functional non-coding DNA--are involved in many developmental and disease-relevant processes. Genome-wide approaches to their discovery and functional characterization are now available and provide a growing knowledge base for the systematic exploration of their role in human biology and disease susceptibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08451

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 123 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Visel, A., Rubin, E. M., & Pennacchio, L. A.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-09
Volume
461
Issue
7261
Pages
199-205
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2048263136
Cited by
610
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 55
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R21HL098940, U01HL066681)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003988)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
enhancers, enhancer function, genome-wide association study, disease susceptibility, human disease genetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review