The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Diploid Genome Sequence of an Individual Human
Open accessAbstract
Presented here is a genome sequence of an individual human. It was produced from approximately 32 million random DNA fragments, sequenced by Sanger dideoxy technology and assembled into 4,528 scaffolds, comprising 2,810 million bases (Mb) of contiguous sequence with approximately 7.5-fold coverage for any given region. We developed a modified version of the Celera assembler to facilitate the identification and comparison of alternate alleles within this individual diploid genome. Comparison of this genome and the National Center for Biotechnology Information human reference assembly revealed more than 4.1 million DNA variants, encompassing 12.3 Mb. These variants (of which 1,288,319 were novel) included 3,213,401 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 53,823 block substitutions (2-206 bp), 292,102 heterozygous insertion/deletion events (indels)(1-571 bp), 559,473 homozygous indels (1-82,711 bp), 90 inversions, as well as numerous segmental duplications and copy number variation regions. Non-SNP DNA variation accounts for 22% of all events identified in the donor, however they involve 74% of all variant bases. This suggests an important role for non-SNP genetic alterations in defining the diploid genome structure. Moreover, 44% of genes were heterozygous for one or more variants. Using a novel haplotype assembly strategy, we were able to span 1.5 Gb of genome sequence in segments >200 kb, providing further precision to the diploid nature of the genome. These data depict a definitive molecular portrait of a diploid human genome that provides a starting point for future genome comparisons and enables an era of individualized genomic information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We could validate 77% of the tandem repeats detected by EHdn in the HuRef genome31 by comparing to tandem repeats detected by an orthogonal strategy involving long-read sequencing data”
From Genome-wide detection of tandem DNA repeats that are expanded in autism (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“This method, Genome STRiP (to be described elsewhere36), integrated both RP and RD features (PD), implying that considering different evidence types can improve SV discovery.”
From Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing (2011) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Thus, leveraging phase information in an association study of rare variants may be crucial, but obtaining phase from sequence data alone is not trivial.24, 91–93”
From Statistical analysis strategies for association studies involving rare variants (2010) · cites this paper as [93]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 133,589
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., & Coulson, A. R. (1977) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · Cited by 68,572
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
Self-citationThe sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Self-citationTandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
Benson, G. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.2.573 · Cited by 9,374
Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors
Margulies, M., Egholm, M., Altman, W. E., Attiya, S., Bader, J. S., Bemben, L. A., Berka, J., Braverman, M. S., Chen, Y.-J., Chen, Z., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03959 · Cited by 7,693
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy AssessmentPreprint
Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · Cited by 6,993
The Structure of Haplotype Blocks in the Human Genome
Gabriel, S. B., Schaffner, S. F., Nguyen, H., Moore, J. M., Roy, J., Blumenstiel, B., Higgins, J., DeFelice, M., Lochner, A., Faggart, M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069424 · Cited by 5,863
A haplotype map of the human genome
The International HapMap Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04226 · Cited by 5,858
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., & Salzberg, S. L. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · Cited by 12,668
A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09534 · Cited by 7,877
Sequencing technologies – the next generation
Metzker, M. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2626 · Cited by 7,066
A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome
Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Maricic, T., Stenzel, U., Kircher, M., Patterson, N., Li, H., Zhai, W., Fritz, M. H.-Y., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188021 · Cited by 4,318
Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry
Bentley, D. R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. P., Smith, G. P., Milton, J., Brown, C. G., Hall, K. P., Evers, D. J., Barnes, C. L., Bignell, H. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07517 · Cited by 3,684
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, S., Sutton, G., Ng, P. C., Feuk, L., Halpern, A. L., Walenz, B. P., Axelrod, N., Huang, J., Kirkness, E. F., Denisov, G., Lin, Y., MacDonald, J. R., Pang, A. W. C., Shago, M., Stockwell, T. B., Tsiamouri, A., Bafna, V., Bansal, V., Kravitz, S. A., Busam, D. A., Beeson, K. Y., McIntosh, T. C., Remington, K. A., Abril, J. F., Gill, J., Borman, J., Rogers, Y.-H., Frazier, M. E., Scherer, S. W., Strausberg, R. L., & Venter, J. C.
- Affiliations
- J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Levy, Samuel
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-09-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e254
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- PMC
- PMC1964779
- OpenAlex
- W2142642738
- Cited by
- 1,778
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 152 · 2012: 153
- FWCI
- 79.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
- Genome Canada
- Ontario Genomics
- Ontario Genomics Institute
- Sick Kids Foundation
- Hospital for Sick Children
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- single nucleotide polymorphisms, structural variants, indels, copy number variation, segmental duplication, inversion, haplotype assembly, genome assembly
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Diploidy, Genotype, Haplotypes, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Molecular Sequence Data, Pedigree, Phenotype, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Human, Human Genome Project, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Dosage, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Chromosomes, Human, Y, Microarray Analysis, INDEL Mutation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
