The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Competition between Stimulators and Antagonists of Upf Complex Recruitment Governs Human Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay
Open accessAbstract
The nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway subjects mRNAs with premature termination codons (PTCs) to rapid decay. The conserved Upf1-3 complex interacts with the eukaryotic translation release factors, eRF3 and eRF1, and triggers NMD when translation termination takes place at a PTC. Contrasting models postulate central roles in PTC-recognition for the exon junction complex in mammals versus the cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) in other eukaryotes. Here we present evidence for a unified model for NMD, in which PTC recognition in human cells is mediated by a competition between 3' UTR-associated factors that stimulate or antagonize recruitment of the Upf complex to the terminating ribosome. We identify cytoplasmic PABP as a human NMD antagonizing factor, which inhibits the interaction between eRF3 and Upf1 in vitro and prevents NMD in cells when positioned in proximity to the termination codon. Surprisingly, only when an extended 3' UTR places cytoplasmic PABP distally to the termination codon does a downstream exon junction complex enhance NMD, likely through increasing the affinity of Upf proteins for the 3' UTR. Interestingly, while an artificial 3' UTR of >420 nucleotides triggers NMD, a large subset of human mRNAs contain longer 3' UTRs but evade NMD. We speculate that these have evolved to concentrate NMD-inhibiting factors, such as PABP, in spatial proximity of the termination codon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Binary specification of nonsense codons by splicing and cytoplasmic translation
Thermann, R., Neu‐Yilik, G., Deters, A., Frede, U., Wehr, K., Hagemeier, C., Hentze, M. W., & Kulozik, A. E. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.12.3484 · Cited by 406
Cited by
NMD: a multifaceted response to premature translational termination
Kervestin, S., & Jacobson, A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3454 · Cited by 572
Gene Expression Regulation by Upstream Open Reading Frames and Human Disease
Barbosa, C., Peixeiro, I., & Romão, L. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003529 · Cited by 525
Mechanism and regulation of the nonsense-mediated decay pathway
Hug, N., Longman, D., & Cáceres, J. F. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw010 · Cited by 535
Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans at a glance
Kurosaki, T., & Maquat, L. E. (2016) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.181008 · Cited by 396
Posttranscriptional Gene Regulation by Spatial Rearrangement of the 3′ Untranslated Region
Eberle, A. B., Stalder, L., Mathys, H., Orozco, R. Z., & Mühlemann, O. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060092 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, G., Rebbapragada, I., & Lykke-Andersen, J.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-04-29
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e111
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2100785765
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.