The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking Human Diseases to Animal Models Using Ontology-Based Phenotype Annotation
Open accessAbstract
Scientists and clinicians who study genetic alterations and disease have traditionally described phenotypes in natural language. The considerable variation in these free-text descriptions has posed a hindrance to the important task of identifying candidate genes and models for human diseases and indicates the need for a computationally tractable method to mine data resources for mutant phenotypes. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that ontological annotation of disease phenotypes will facilitate the discovery of new genotype-phenotype relationships within and across species. To describe phenotypes using ontologies, we used an Entity-Quality (EQ) methodology, wherein the affected entity (E) and how it is affected (Q) are recorded using terms from a variety of ontologies. Using this EQ method, we annotated the phenotypes of 11 gene-linked human diseases described in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). These human annotations were loaded into our Ontology-Based Database (OBD) along with other ontology-based phenotype descriptions of mutants from various model organism databases. Phenotypes recorded with this EQ method can be computationally compared based on the hierarchy of terms in the ontologies and the frequency of annotation. We utilized four similarity metrics to compare phenotypes and developed an ontology of homologous and analogous anatomical structures to compare phenotypes between species. Using these tools, we demonstrate that we can identify, through the similarity of the recorded phenotypes, other alleles of the same gene, other members of a signaling pathway, and orthologous genes and pathway members across species. We conclude that EQ-based annotation of phenotypes, in conjunction with a cross-species ontology, and a variety of similarity metrics can identify biologically meaningful similarities between genes by comparing phenotypes alone. This annotation and search method provides a novel and efficient means to identify gene candidates and animal models of human disease, which may shorten the lengthy path to identification and understanding of the genetic basis of human disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO terms
Wang, J. Z., Du, Z., Payattakool, R., Yu, P. S., & Chen, C.-F. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm087 · Cited by 1,377
The human phenotype ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease
Robinson, P. N., Köhler, S., Bauer, S., Seelow, D., Horn, D., & Mundlos, S. (2008) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.09.017 · Cited by 1,034
Svärd, J., Henricson, K. H., Persson-Lek, M., Rozell, B., Lauth, M., Bergström, Å., Ericson, J., Toftgård, R., & Teglund, S. (2006) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2005.12.013 · Cited by 468
Bard, J., Rhee, S. Y., & Ashburner, M. (2005) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r21 · Cited by 416
Self-citationArsov, T., Silva, D. G., O’Bryan, M. K., Sainsbury, A., Lee, N. J., Kennedy, C., Manji, S. S. M., Nelms, K., Liu, C., Vinuesa, C. G., et al. (2006) · Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/me.2005-0494 · Cited by 166
Cited by
Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology
Mungall, C. J., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G. V., Lewis, S. E., & Haendel, M. A. (2012) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5 · Cited by 732
The Matchmaker Exchange: A Platform for Rare Disease Gene Discovery
Philippakis, A. A., Azzariti, D. R., Beltran, S., Brookes, A. J., Brownstein, C. A., Brudno, M., Brunner, H. G., Buske, O. J., Carey, K., Doll, C., et al. (2015) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.22858 · Cited by 469
Self-citationNext-generation diagnostics and disease-gene discovery with the Exomiser
Smedley, D., Jacobsen, J. O. B., Jäger, M., Köhler, S., Holtgrewe, M., Schubach, M., Siragusa, E., Zemojtel, T., Buske, O. J., Washington, N. L., et al. (2015) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2015.124 · Cited by 445
Self-citationMungall, C. J., McMurry, J. A., Köhler, S., Balhoff, J. P., Borromeo, C., Brush, M., Carbon, S., Conlin, T., Dunn, N., Engelstad, M., et al. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1128 · Cited by 441
Self-citationThe Human Phenotype Ontology in 2024: phenotypes around the world
Gargano, M. A., Matentzoglu, N., Coleman, B., Addo-Lartey, E. B., Anagnostopoulos, A. V., Anderton, J., Avillach, P., Bagley, A. M., Bakštein, E., Balhoff, J. P., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1005 · Cited by 410
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Washington, N. L., Haendel, M. A., Mungall, C. J., Ashburner, M., Westerfield, M., & Lewis, S. E.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-11-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e1000247
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2048024098
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.