Cited by 750Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesSemantic Web and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology

Open access
Mungall, Christopher J, Torniai, Carlo, Gkoutos, Georgios V, Lewis, Suzanna E, Haendel, Melissa A·2012·Genome biology

Abstract

We present Uberon, an integrated cross-species ontology consisting of over 6,500 classes representing a variety of anatomical entities, organized according to traditional anatomical classification criteria. The ontology represents structures in a species-neutral way and includes extensive associations to existing species-centric anatomical ontologies, allowing integration of model organism and human data. Uberon provides a necessary bridge between anatomical structures in different taxa for cross-species inference. It uses novel methods for representing taxonomic variation, and has proved to be essential for translational phenotype analyses. Uberon is available at http://uberon.org.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When possible, all source tissues have been mapped to standardized Uberon identifiers, enabling merging of repetitive tissues.

    “When possible, all source tissues have been mapped to standardized Uberon (38) identifiers, enabling us to merge repetitive tissues.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Travillian R Malone J Pang C Hancock J Holland PW Schofield P Parkinson H The Vertebrate Bridging Ontology (VBO). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Biomedical Ontology: July 26-30, 2011; Buffalo, NY 2011 http://icbo.buffalo.edu/ICBO-2011_Proceedings.pdf
  2. Osumi-Sutherland D CARO 2.0. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Biomedical Ontology: July 26-30, 2011; Buffalo, NY 2011 http://icbo.buffalo.edu/ICBO-2011_Proceedings.pdf
  3. Torniai C Brush M Vasilevsky N Segerdell E Wilson ML Johnson T Corday K Shaffer C Haendel M Developing an application ontology for biomedical resource annotation and retrieval: Challenges and lessons learned. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Biomedical Ontology: July 26-30, 2011; Buffalo, NY 2011 http://icbo.buffalo.edu/ICBO-2011_Proceedings.pdf
  4. Segerdell E Wilson ML Bashor T Bourges-Waldegg D Corday K Frost HR Johnson T Shaffer CJ Stone L Torniai C Haendel MA eagle-i: an ontology-driven framework for biomedical resource annotation and discovery. Nat Precedings 2010 http://precedings.nature.com/documents/5176/version/1/files/npre20105176-1.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mungall, C. J., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G. V., Lewis, S. E., & Haendel, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Genome biology
Published
2012-01-31
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
R5-R5
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2116034137
Cited by
732
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • National Institutes of Health (2p41hg002273-07, 5u24rr029825-02, DE-AC02–05CH11231)
  • Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, 05CH11231)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U41HG002273, R01HG004838, P41HG002273-09S1, P41-HG002273)
  • National Center for Research Resources (1U24RR029825-01)
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02, DE-AC02-05CH11231., AC02–05CH11231)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
UBERON, anatomy ontology, anatomical classification, taxonomic variation, human anatomy
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Comparative, Classification, Humans, Phenotype, Software, Species Specificity, Databases, Factual, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review