Cited by 472Nerve injury and regenerationHereditary Neurological DisordersAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Endogenous Nmnat2 Is an Essential Survival Factor for Maintenance of Healthy Axons

Open access
Gilley, Jonathan, Coleman, Michael P.·2010·PLoS Biology

Abstract

The molecular triggers for axon degeneration remain unknown. We identify endogenous Nmnat2 as a labile axon survival factor whose constant replenishment by anterograde axonal transport is a limiting factor for axon survival. Specific depletion of Nmnat2 is sufficient to induce Wallerian-like degeneration of uninjured axons which endogenous Nmnat1 and Nmnat3 cannot prevent. Nmnat2 is by far the most labile Nmnat isoform and is depleted in distal stumps of injured neurites before Wallerian degeneration begins. Nmnat2 turnover is equally rapid in injured Wld(S) neurites, despite delayed neurite degeneration, showing it is not a consequence of degeneration and also that Wld(S) does not stabilize Nmnat2. Depletion of Nmnat2 below a threshold level is necessary for axon degeneration since exogenous Nmnat2 can protect injured neurites when expressed at high enough levels to overcome its short half-life. Furthermore, proteasome inhibition slows both Nmnat2 turnover and neurite degeneration. We conclude that endogenous Nmnat2 prevents spontaneous degeneration of healthy axons and propose that, when present, the more long-lived, functionally related Wld(S) protein substitutes for Nmnat2 loss after axon injury. Endogenous Nmnat2 represents an exciting new therapeutic target for axonal disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000300

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 472

Authors
Gilley, J., & Coleman, M. P.
Affiliations
Babraham Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Coleman, Michael P.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2010-01-26
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e1000300
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2033382767
Cited by
472
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 22
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council (G0300408)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
NMNAT2, axonal degeneration, Wallerian degeneration, axon survival, NMNAT1, NMNAT3, axonal transport, proteasome, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Cell Line, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Degeneration, Nicotinamide-Nucleotide Adenylyltransferase, Neurites, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Rats, Rats, Transgenic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review