The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Analysis of Stochastic Transcription Cycles
Open accessAbstract
In individual mammalian cells the expression of some genes such as prolactin is highly variable over time and has been suggested to occur in stochastic pulses. To investigate the origins of this behavior and to understand its functional relevance, we quantitatively analyzed this variability using new mathematical tools that allowed us to reconstruct dynamic transcription rates of different reporter genes controlled by identical promoters in the same living cell. Quantitative microscopic analysis of two reporter genes, firefly luciferase and destabilized EGFP, was used to analyze the dynamics of prolactin promoter-directed gene expression in living individual clonal and primary pituitary cells over periods of up to 25 h. We quantified the time-dependence and cyclicity of the transcription pulses and estimated the length and variation of active and inactive transcription phases. We showed an average cycle period of approximately 11 h and demonstrated that while the measured time distribution of active phases agreed with commonly accepted models of transcription, the inactive phases were differently distributed and showed strong memory, with a refractory period of transcriptional inactivation close to 3 h. Cycles in transcription occurred at two distinct prolactin-promoter controlled reporter genes in the same individual clonal or primary cells. However, the timing of the cycles was independent and out-of-phase. For the first time, we have analyzed transcription dynamics from two equivalent loci in real-time in single cells. In unstimulated conditions, cells showed independent transcription dynamics at each locus. A key result from these analyses was the evidence for a minimum refractory period in the inactive-phase of transcription. The response to acute signals and the result of manipulation of histone acetylation was consistent with the hypothesis that this refractory period corresponded to a phase of chromatin remodeling which significantly increased the cyclicity. Stochastically timed bursts of transcription in an apparently random subset of cells in a tissue may thus produce an overall coordinated but heterogeneous phenotype capable of acute responses to stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., & Swain, P. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070919 · Cited by 5,441
Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells
Raj, A., Peskin, C. S., Tranchina, D., Vargas, D. Y., & Tyagi, S. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309 · Cited by 1,737
Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
Raser, J. M., & O'Shea, E. K. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098641 · Cited by 1,425
Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression
Nelson, D. E., Ihekwaba, A. E. C., Elliott, M., Johnson, J. R., Gibney, C. A., Foreman, B. E., Nelson, G., See, V., Horton, C. A., Spiller, D. G., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099962 · Cited by 1,186
Self-citationProbing Gene Expression in Live Cells, One Protein Molecule at a Time
Yu, J., Xiao, J., Ren, X., Lao, K., & Xie, X. S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1119623 · Cited by 918
Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation
Fraser, P., & Bickmore, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05916 · Cited by 734
Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast
Zenklusen, D., Larson, D. R., & Singer, R. H. (2008) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1514 · Cited by 684
Pulsatile Stimulation Determines Timing and Specificity of NF-κB-Dependent Transcription
Ashall, L., Horton, C. A., Nelson, D. E., Paszek, P., Harper, C. V., Sillitoe, K., Ryan, S., Spiller, D. G., Unitt, J. F., Broomhead, D. S., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164860 · Cited by 543
Self-citationEffects of Molecular Memory and Bursting on Fluctuations in Gene Expression
Pedraza, J. M., & Paulsson, J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144331 · Cited by 404
Ultradian hormone stimulation induces glucocorticoid receptor-mediated pulses of gene transcription
Stavreva, D. A., Wiench, M., John, S., Conway-Campbell, B. L., McKenna, M. A., Pooley, J. R., Johnson, T. A., Voss, T. C., Lightman, S. L., & Hager, G. L. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1922 · Cited by 375 · cited 1×
“response to pulsatile stimulation [45].”
Cited by
Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors
Voss, T. C., & Hager, G. L. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3623 · Cited by 504
Eukaryotic transcriptional dynamics: from single molecules to cell populations
Coulon, A., Chow, C. C., Singer, R. H., & Larson, D. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3484 · Cited by 309
Transcription in Living Cells: Molecular Mechanisms of Bursting
Rodriguez, J., & Larson, D. R. (2020) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-011520-105250 · Cited by 224
What Is a Transcriptional Burst?
Tunnacliffe, E., & Chubb, J. R. (2020) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2020.01.003 · Cited by 223
Biased Allelic Expression in Human Primary Fibroblast Single Cells
Borel, C., Ferreira, P. G., Santoni, F., Delaneau, O., Fort, A., Popadin, K. Y., Garieri, M., Falconnet, E., Ribaux, P., Guipponi, M., et al. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.12.001 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Harper, C. V., Finkenstädt, B., Woodcock, D. J., Friedrichsen, S., Semprini, S., Ashall, L., Spiller, D. G., Mullins, J. J., Rand, D. A., Davis, J. R. E., & White, M. R. H.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1000607
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2103018966
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.