Cited by 118Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Chrna2-Martinotti cells synchronize layer 5 type A pyramidal cells via rebound excitation

Open access
Hilscher, Markus M., Leão, Richardson N., Edwards, Steven J., Leão, Katarina E., Kullander, Klas·2017·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Martinotti cells are the most prominent distal dendrite-targeting interneurons in the cortex, but their role in controlling pyramidal cell (PC) activity is largely unknown. Here, we show that the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α2 subunit (Chrna2) specifically marks layer 5 (L5) Martinotti cells projecting to layer 1. Furthermore, we confirm that Chrna2-expressing Martinotti cells selectively target L5 thick-tufted type A PCs but not thin-tufted type B PCs. Using optogenetic activation and inhibition, we demonstrate how Chrna2-Martinotti cells robustly reset and synchronize type A PCs via slow rhythmic burst activity and rebound excitation. Moreover, using optical feedback inhibition, in which PC spikes controlled the firing of surrounding Chrna2-Martinotti cells, we found that neighboring PC spike trains became synchronized by Martinotti cell inhibition. Together, our results show that L5 Martinotti cells participate in defined cortical circuits and can synchronize PCs in a frequency-dependent manner. These findings suggest that Martinotti cells are pivotal for coordinated PC activity, which is involved in cortical information processing and cognitive control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001392

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SST+ Martinotti cells are transcriptionally heterogeneous and have an ascending axon that arborizes profusely in layer 1.

    “SST+ Martinotti cells constitute a transcriptionally heterogeneous group of interneurons characterized by an ascending axon that arborizes profusely in layer 1”

    From Development and Functional Diversification of Cortical Interneurons (2018) · cites this paper as Hilscher et al., 2017

  • In mPFC of Chrna2-Cre mice, 90.61±4.210% (n=6 mice) of Chrna2-Cre+ cells show SST immunoreactivity.

    “To selectively manipulate LTS-SST interneurons, we used Chrna2-Cre mice13 in which 90.61+/−4.210% (n=6 mice) of mPFC Chrna2-Cre+cells show SST immunoreactivity (Fig.6A).”
  • Chrna2+ LTS-SST interneurons selectively target deep-layer pyramidal neurons that typically project to sub-cortical targets but not callosal projection neurons or intratelencephalic neurons.

    “Importantly, Chrna2+LTS-SST interneurons were previously shown to selectively target deep-layer pyramidal neurons that typically project to sub-cortical targets but not to callosal projection neurons or intratelencephalic neurons13; consistent with this finding, we observed no change in inhibitory drive in mPFC neurons projecting to the contralateral PFC (mPFC->cPFC) or nucleus accumbens (mPFC->NA”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 118

Authors
Hilscher, M. M., Leão, R. N., Edwards, S. J., Leão, K. E., & Kullander, K.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Hilscher, Markus M.
  • Kullander, Klas
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2017-02-09
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
e2001392
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2586597606
Cited by
118
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • American Tinnitus Association
  • Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Governo Brasil
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Division of Graduate Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
Martinotti cells, CHRNA2, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, layer 5 pyramidal cells, rebound excitation, neuronal synchronization, cortical circuits, optogenetics, cognitive control
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Female, Interneurons, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Receptors, Nicotinic, Time Factors, Pyramidal Cells, Cell Shape, Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review