The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural mechanisms of rhythm-based temporal prediction: Delta phase-locking reflects temporal predictability but not rhythmic entrainment
Open accessAbstract
Predicting the timing of upcoming events enables efficient resource allocation and action preparation. Rhythmic streams, such as music, speech, and biological motion, constitute a pervasive source for temporal predictions. Widely accepted entrainment theories postulate that rhythm-based predictions are mediated by synchronizing low-frequency neural oscillations to the rhythm, as indicated by increased phase concentration (PC) of low-frequency neural activity for rhythmic compared to random streams. However, we show here that PC enhancement in scalp recordings is not specific to rhythms but is observed to the same extent in less periodic streams if they enable memory-based prediction. This is inconsistent with the predictions of a computational entrainment model of stronger PC for rhythmic streams. Anticipatory change in alpha activity and facilitation of electroencephalogram (EEG) manifestations of response selection are also comparable between rhythm- and memory-based predictions. However, rhythmic sequences uniquely result in obligatory depression of preparation-related premotor brain activity when an on-beat event is omitted, even when it is strategically beneficial to maintain preparation, leading to larger behavioral costs for violation of prediction. Thus, while our findings undermine the validity of PC as a sign of rhythmic entrainment, they constitute the first electrophysiological dissociation, to our knowledge, between mechanisms of rhythmic predictions and of memory-based predictions: the former obligatorily lead to resonance-like preparation patterns (that are in line with entrainment), while the latter allow flexible resource allocation in time regardless of periodicity in the input. Taken together, they delineate the neural mechanisms of three distinct modes of preparation: continuous vigilance, interval-timing-based prediction and rhythm-based prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
CircStat : A MATLAB Toolbox for Circular Statistics
Berens, P. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v031.i10 · Cited by 3,099
Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154735 · Cited by 1,719
Cellular and network mechanisms of rhythmic recurrent activity in neocortex
Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & McCormick, D. A. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/79848 · Cited by 1,539
Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception
Verleger, R., Jaśkowski, P., & Wascher, E. (2005) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.165 · Cited by 569
Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention
Doherty, J. R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M. M., & Nobre, A. C. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1821-05.2005 · Cited by 357
Cited by
A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment
Lakatos, P., Gross, J., & Thut, G. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.075 · Cited by 508
Korolczuk, I., Burle, B., Coull, J. T., & Śmigasiewicz, K. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01795 · Cited by 528
Keitel, A., Gross, J., & Kayser, C. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004473 · Cited by 312
Proactive Sensing of Periodic and Aperiodic Auditory Patterns
Rimmele, J. M., Morillon, B., Poeppel, D., & Arnal, L. H. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.003 · Cited by 267
Interactional synchrony: signals, mechanisms and benefits
Hoehl, S., Fairhurst, M., & Schirmer, A. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa024 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Breska, A., & Deouell, L. Y.
- Venue
- PLOS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2017-02-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e2001665
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2587139056
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.