Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The actin remodeling protein cofilin is crucial for thymic αβ but not γδ T-cell development

Seeland, Isabel, Xiong, Ying, Orlik, Christian, Deibel, Daniel, Prokosch, Sandra, Küblbeck, Günter, Jahraus, Beate, De Stefano, Daniela, Moos, Sonja, Kurschus, Florian C., Arnold, Bernd, Samstag, Yvonne·2018·PLOS Biology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005380

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Cofilin expressed from an eGFP-2A-Cfl1 cassette is not functional in T-cells. Jurkat T cells were either transfected with no siRNA (mock), a nontargeting control siRNA or a cofilin-specific siRNA (binding to the 3′ UTR), in order to downregulate endogenous cofilin. Some of the cells that received cofilin siRNA were cotransfected with Cfl1-eGFP control vector or a vector carrying the eGFP-2A-Cfl1 sequence under the control of the CMV promoter. Cells were harvested and analyzed 48 h after transfection. (A) Exemplary flow cytometric analysis of eGFP expression of transfected Jurkat cells (n = 4 independent experiments). (B) Western blot analysis of total cell lysates by staining for total cofilin and GAPDH. All samples were normalized to cells transfected with cofilin siRNA, which was set as 1. Data is represented as mean ± SEM (n = 4 independent experiments). (C) Exemplary western blot showing pCfl1, total Cfl1, and control GAPDH staining. Endogenous cofilin has a size of 19 kDa (lanes 1–3 and 5), whereas cofilin derived from the Cfl1-eGFP control vector is expressed as eGFP fusion protein (size: 46 kDa, lane 4). (D) Total cellular F-actin content was analyzed by flow cytometric measurement of phalloidin binding. All samples were normalized to cells transfected with cofilin siRNA. Data is represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). Significances were calculated against Jurkat cells transfected with siRNA only. ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. Cfl1, cofilin-1; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ns, not significant.
Fig 1 Cofilin expressed from an eGFP-2A-Cfl1 cassette is not functional in T-cells. Jurkat T cells were either transfected with no siRNA (mock), a nontargeting control siRNA or a cofilin-specific siRNA (binding to the 3′ UTR), in order to downregulate endogenous cofilin. Some of the cells that received cofilin siRNA were cotransfected with Cfl1-eGFP control vector or a vector carrying the eGFP-2A-Cfl1 sequence under the control of the CMV promoter. Cells were harvested and analyzed 48 h after transfection. (A) Exemplary flow cytometric analysis of eGFP expression of transfected Jurkat cells (n = 4 independent experiments). (B) Western blot analysis of total cell lysates by staining for total cofilin and GAPDH. All samples were normalized to cells transfected with cofilin siRNA, which was set as 1. Data is represented as mean ± SEM (n = 4 independent experiments). (C) Exemplary western blot showing pCfl1, total Cfl1, and control GAPDH staining. Endogenous cofilin has a size of 19 kDa (lanes 1–3 and 5), whereas cofilin derived from the Cfl1-eGFP control vector is expressed as eGFP fusion protein (size: 46 kDa, lane 4). (D) Total cellular F-actin content was analyzed by flow cytometric measurement of phalloidin binding. All samples were normalized to cells transfected with cofilin siRNA. Data is represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). Significances were calculated against Jurkat cells transfected with siRNA only. ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. Cfl1, cofilin-1; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ns, not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 Mice expressing nf cofilin show a severe thymus atrophy and a developmental arrest at the DN3 stage. (A) Total T-cell number in spleen of B6 mice and nf cofilin knock-in mice (n = 6 independent experiments with a total of ≥8 mice per group). (B) Thymus was isolated and weighed, and the total cell number was determined from 4–5-weeks-old B6 or nf cofilin knock-in mice (n = 6 independent experiments with a total of ≥10 mice per group). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of thymocyte differentiation by CD4, CD8, CD25, and CD44 staining (n ≥ 8 mice per group). Exemplary dot blots from representative mice are shown on the left, whereas the statistical evaluation of summary data is shown in the middle (for DN, DP, and SP stages) and on the right (for DN cell stages). (D) Creation of mixed bone marrow chimera. Lethally irradiated B6 mice were reconstituted with equal numbers of CD3+ cell–depleted BM cells from CD45.2+ tester (Cfl1nf/nf) and CD45.1+ competitor (B6) mice. Total chimerism was measured and CD4 versus CD8 plots show the developmental stage of thymocytes derived from CD45.1+ or CD45.2+ BM cells. Plots are representative of six mixed chimeras per group. Bar graphs show the average abundance of each major thymocyte population within the chimera from both tester (CD45.2+) and competitor (CD45.1+) donor cells. Data is represented as mean ± SEM. **** = p<0.0001; ** = p<0.01. Underlying Data can be found in S1 Data. BM, bone marrow; DN, double negative; DP, double positive; SP, single positive.
Fig 2 Mice expressing nf cofilin show a severe thymus atrophy and a developmental arrest at the DN3 stage. (A) Total T-cell number in spleen of B6 mice and nf cofilin knock-in mice (n = 6 independent experiments with a total of ≥8 mice per group). (B) Thymus was isolated and weighed, and the total cell number was determined from 4–5-weeks-old B6 or nf cofilin knock-in mice (n = 6 independent experiments with a total of ≥10 mice per group). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of thymocyte differentiation by CD4, CD8, CD25, and CD44 staining (n ≥ 8 mice per group). Exemplary dot blots from representative mice are shown on the left, whereas the statistical evaluation of summary data is shown in the middle (for DN, DP, and SP stages) and on the right (for DN cell stages). (D) Creation of mixed bone marrow chimera. Lethally irradiated B6 mice were reconstituted with equal numbers of CD3+ cell–depleted BM cells from CD45.2+ tester (Cfl1nf/nf) and CD45.1+ competitor (B6) mice. Total chimerism was measured and CD4 versus CD8 plots show the developmental stage of thymocytes derived from CD45.1+ or CD45.2+ BM cells. Plots are representative of six mixed chimeras per group. Bar graphs show the average abundance of each major thymocyte population within the chimera from both tester (CD45.2+) and competitor (CD45.1+) donor cells. Data is represented as mean ± SEM. **** = p<0.0001; ** = p<0.01. Underlying Data can be found in S1 Data. BM, bone marrow; DN, double negative; DP, double positive; SP, single positive.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 DN thymocytes of Cfl1nf/nf mice show a dramatically enhanced F-actin content and impaired migratory capacity as well as a lack of TCRβ surface expression. (A) CD3+ splenocytes were analyzed for expression of TCRβ and TCRγδ. Shown are representative dot blots (left panels) and calculated absolute cell numbers (right panel) of TCRβ and TCRγδ expressing cells. Data is represented as mean ± SEM and summarizes 3 independent experiments with a total of 6 mice per group. (B) Total F-actin amount of DN thymocytes or γδ thymocytes was determined by SiR-actin staining (n = 3 independent experiments with a total ≥6 mice per group). (C) Migratory capacity of DN cells or γδ thymocytes was determined in a transwell assay (pore size 5 μm) in which SDF-1α (200 ng/ml) was used as chemotactic stimulus. Migration was carried out for 3 h (n = 3 independent experiments with ≥4 mice per group). (D) TCRβ surface (surface TCRβ) and intracellular (ic TCRβ) expression was analyzed in DN cells by flow cytometry. Representative dot plots from TCRβ versus TCRγδ staining on B6 and Cfl1nf/nf DN cells are shown (n = 4 independent experiments with a total of ≥7 mice per group). (E) Analysis of surface and ic expression of TCRβ in DN cells of B6 (grey bar) and Cfl1nf/nf mice (black bar) (left bar chart). Analysis of MFI of TCRβ of icTCRβ+ DN cells of B6 (grey bar) and Cfl1nf/nf mice (black bar) (right bar chart). (F) Analysis of surface expression of TCRβ in DN thymocytes of B6 and Cfl1nf/nf mice before (-cytoD) and after cytochalasin D treatment (+cytoD). Data is represented as mean ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. cytoD, cytochalasin D; ic, intracellular; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity nf, nonfunctional; ns, not significant.
Fig 3 DN thymocytes of Cfl1nf/nf mice show a dramatically enhanced F-actin content and impaired migratory capacity as well as a lack of TCRβ surface expression. (A) CD3+ splenocytes were analyzed for expression of TCRβ and TCRγδ. Shown are representative dot blots (left panels) and calculated absolute cell numbers (right panel) of TCRβ and TCRγδ expressing cells. Data is represented as mean ± SEM and summarizes 3 independent experiments with a total of 6 mice per group. (B) Total F-actin amount of DN thymocytes or γδ thymocytes was determined by SiR-actin staining (n = 3 independent experiments with a total ≥6 mice per group). (C) Migratory capacity of DN cells or γδ thymocytes was determined in a transwell assay (pore size 5 μm) in which SDF-1α (200 ng/ml) was used as chemotactic stimulus. Migration was carried out for 3 h (n = 3 independent experiments with ≥4 mice per group). (D) TCRβ surface (surface TCRβ) and intracellular (ic TCRβ) expression was analyzed in DN cells by flow cytometry. Representative dot plots from TCRβ versus TCRγδ staining on B6 and Cfl1nf/nf DN cells are shown (n = 4 independent experiments with a total of ≥7 mice per group). (E) Analysis of surface and ic expression of TCRβ in DN cells of B6 (grey bar) and Cfl1nf/nf mice (black bar) (left bar chart). Analysis of MFI of TCRβ of icTCRβ+ DN cells of B6 (grey bar) and Cfl1nf/nf mice (black bar) (right bar chart). (F) Analysis of surface expression of TCRβ in DN thymocytes of B6 and Cfl1nf/nf mice before (-cytoD) and after cytochalasin D treatment (+cytoD). Data is represented as mean ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. cytoD, cytochalasin D; ic, intracellular; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity nf, nonfunctional; ns, not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 4 Cfl1nf/nf mice show normal γδ T-cell subsets which remain functional. (A) Analysis of the surface expression of Vγ1, Vγ2, and Vγ3 of γδ T-cells isolated from the spleen, skin, lung, and thymus of B6 (grey bar) or Cfl1nf/nf mice (black bar) (n = 4 independent experiments with ≥4 mice per group). (B) Analysis of the surface expression of CD24, CD27, and CD44 of γδ thymocytes of B6 (grey bar) or Cfl1nf/nf mice (black bar) (n = 4 independent experiments with ≥4 mice per group). (C) In vitro activation of splenic γδ T cells of Cfl1nf/nf (black bar) and control mice (grey bar) by plate-bound CD3 and CD28 antibodies for 24 h. Determination of the T-cell activation markers CD25 (left bar chart) and CD69 (right bar chart) by flow cytometry. (D) Age- and sex-matched Cfl1nf/nf (red line) and Cfl1+/+ (black line) mice at 7 weeks of age were used for an IMQ-induced psoriasis-like model. Over 6 days, prior to topical application of IMQ, scores of individual parameters such as scaling, back skin thickness, and erythema formation were measured and the accumulated PASI was calculated. (E) Flow cytometric analysis of IL-17A and RORγt expression in γδ T cells of skin-draining LNs. Cytokine production was assessed after 6 days of topical application of IMQ containing Aldara crème (Sham) or control crème (Aldara) (experiment with ≥4 mice per group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. Cfl1, cofilin-1; IMQ, imiquimod; ns, not significant; PASI, psoriasis area severity index.
Fig 4 Cfl1nf/nf mice show normal γδ T-cell subsets which remain functional. (A) Analysis of the surface expression of Vγ1, Vγ2, and Vγ3 of γδ T-cells isolated from the spleen, skin, lung, and thymus of B6 (grey bar) or Cfl1nf/nf mice (black bar) (n = 4 independent experiments with ≥4 mice per group). (B) Analysis of the surface expression of CD24, CD27, and CD44 of γδ thymocytes of B6 (grey bar) or Cfl1nf/nf mice (black bar) (n = 4 independent experiments with ≥4 mice per group). (C) In vitro activation of splenic γδ T cells of Cfl1nf/nf (black bar) and control mice (grey bar) by plate-bound CD3 and CD28 antibodies for 24 h. Determination of the T-cell activation markers CD25 (left bar chart) and CD69 (right bar chart) by flow cytometry. (D) Age- and sex-matched Cfl1nf/nf (red line) and Cfl1+/+ (black line) mice at 7 weeks of age were used for an IMQ-induced psoriasis-like model. Over 6 days, prior to topical application of IMQ, scores of individual parameters such as scaling, back skin thickness, and erythema formation were measured and the accumulated PASI was calculated. (E) Flow cytometric analysis of IL-17A and RORγt expression in γδ T cells of skin-draining LNs. Cytokine production was assessed after 6 days of topical application of IMQ containing Aldara crème (Sham) or control crème (Aldara) (experiment with ≥4 mice per group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. Cfl1, cofilin-1; IMQ, imiquimod; ns, not significant; PASI, psoriasis area severity index.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. JK Burkhardt, 2008, The actin cytoskeleton in T cell activation, Annu Rev Immunol, 26, 233, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090347 · DOI
  2. KL Angus, 2013, Cell polarisation and the immunological synapse, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 25, 85, 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.08.013 · DOI
  3. I Piragyte, 2012, Actin engine in immunological synapse, Immune Netw, 12, 71, 10.4110/in.2012.12.3.71 · DOI
  4. Y Samstag, 2003, Actin cytoskeletal dynamics in T lymphocyte activation and migration, J Leukoc Biol, 73, 30, 10.1189/jlb.0602272 · DOI
  5. S Kumari, 2014, T cell antigen receptor activation and actin cytoskeleton remodeling, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1838, 546, 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.05.004 · DOI
  6. MK Vartiainen, 2002, The three mouse actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilins evolved to fulfill cell-type-specific requirements for actin dynamics, Mol Biol Cell, 13, 183, 10.1091/mbc.01-07-0331 · DOI
  7. E Nishida, 1984, Cofilin, a protein in porcine brain that binds to actin filaments and inhibits their interactions with myosin and tropomyosin, Biochemistry, 23, 5307, 10.1021/bi00317a032 · DOI
  8. H Abe, 1989, A cofilin-like protein is involved in the regulation of actin assembly in developing skeletal muscle, J Biochem, 106, 696, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a122919 · DOI
  9. K Moriyama, 1990, Destrin, a mammalian actin-depolymerizing protein, is closely related to cofilin. Cloning and expression of porcine brain destrin cDNA, J Biol Chem, 265, 5768, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39429-3 · DOI
  10. Y Samstag, 1994, Costimulatory signals for human T-cell activation induce nuclear translocation of pp19/cofilin, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 91, 4494, 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4494 · DOI
  11. J Condeelis, 2001, How is actin polymerization nucleated in vivo?, Trends Cell Biol, 11, 288, 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02008-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Y Samstag, 1991, A serine phosphatase is involved in CD2-mediated activation of human T lymphocytes and natural killer cells, J Immunol, 147, 788, 10.4049/jimmunol.147.3.788 · DOI
  13. Y Samstag, 1992, Dephosphorylation of pp19: a common second signal for human T cell activation mediated through different accessory molecules, Int Immunol, 4, 1255, 10.1093/intimm/4.11.1255 · DOI
  14. SM Eibert, 2004, Cofilin peptide homologs interfere with immunological synapse formation and T cell activation, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 1957, 10.1073/pnas.0308282100 · DOI
  15. KH Lee, 2000, Cofilin: a missing link between T cell co-stimulation and rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton, Eur J Immunol, 30, 892, 10.1002/1521-4141(200003)30:3<892::AID-IMMU892>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  16. Y Samstag, 2013, Cofilin: a redox sensitive mediator of actin dynamics during T-cell activation and migration, Immunol Rev, 256, 30, 10.1111/imr.12115 · DOI
  17. A Pendleton, 2003, Latrunculin B or ATP depletion induces cofilin-dependent translocation of actin into nuclei of mast cells, J Biol Chem, 278, 14394, 10.1074/jbc.M206393200 · DOI
  18. K Falahzadeh, 2015, The potential roles of actin in the nucleus, Cell J, 17, 7
  19. M Klemke, 2010, An MEK-cofilin signalling module controls migration of human T cells in 3D but not 2D environments, EMBO J, 29, 2915, 10.1038/emboj.2010.153 · DOI
  20. P Friedl, 1998, CD4+ T lymphocytes migrating in three-dimensional collagen lattices lack focal adhesions and utilize beta1 integrin-independent strategies for polarization, interaction with collagen fibers and locomotion, Eur J Immunol, 28, 2331, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199808)28:08<2331::AID-IMMU2331>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  21. K Wolf, 2003, Amoeboid shape change and contact guidance: T-lymphocyte crawling through fibrillar collagen is independent of matrix remodeling by MMPs and other proteases, Blood, 102, 3262, 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3791 · DOI
  22. E Woolf, 2007, Lymph node chemokines promote sustained T lymphocyte motility without triggering stable integrin adhesiveness in the absence of shear forces, Nat Immunol, 8, 1076, 10.1038/ni1499 · DOI
  23. T Lammermann, 2008, Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing, Nature, 453, 51, 10.1038/nature06887 · DOI · Paper page
  24. GH Wabnitz, 2010, Mitochondrial translocation of oxidized cofilin induces caspase-independent necrotic-like programmed cell death of T cells, Cell Death Dis, 1, e58, 10.1038/cddis.2010.36 · DOI
  25. M Klemke, 2008, Oxidation of cofilin mediates T cell hyporesponsiveness under oxidative stress conditions, Immunity, 29, 404, 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.06.016 · DOI
  26. B Schulte, 2013, A reducing milieu renders cofilin insensitive to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) inhibition, J Biol Chem, 288, 29430, 10.1074/jbc.M113.479766 · DOI
  27. AT De Souza, 2006, Transcriptional and phenotypic comparisons of Ppara knockout and siRNA knockdown mice, Nucleic Acids Res, 34, 4486, 10.1093/nar/gkl609 · DOI
  28. A Rossi, 2015, Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns, Nature, 524, 230, 10.1038/nature14580 · DOI
  29. MD Ryan, 1991, Cleavage of foot-and-mouth disease virus polyprotein is mediated by residues located within a 19 amino acid sequence, Journal of General Virology, 72, 2727, 10.1099/0022-1317-72-11-2727 · DOI
  30. MD Ryan, 1999, A model for nonstoichiometric, cotranslational protein scission in eukaryotic ribosomes, Bioorganic Chemistry, 27, 55, 10.1006/bioo.1998.1119 · DOI
  31. MLL Donnelly, 2001, Analysis of the aphthovirus 2A/2B polyprotein 'cleavage' mechanism indicates not a proteolytic reaction, but a novel translational effect: a putative ribosomal 'skip', Journal of General Virology, 82, 1013, 10.1099/0022-1317-82-5-1013 · DOI
  32. PC Orban, 1992, Tissue- and site-specific DNA recombination in transgenic mice, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 89, 6861, 10.1073/pnas.89.15.6861 · DOI
  33. C Shimizu, 2001, Progression of T cell lineage restriction in the earliest subpopulation of murine adult thymus visualized by the expression of lck proximal promoter activity, Int Immunol, 13, 105, 10.1093/intimm/13.1.105 · DOI
  34. DI Godfrey, 1993, A developmental pathway involving four phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets of CD3-CD4-CD8- triple-negative adult mouse thymocytes defined by CD44 and CD25 expression, J Immunol, 150, 4244, 10.4049/jimmunol.150.10.4244 · DOI
  35. RM Laird, 2010, Roles of the Src tyrosine kinases Lck and Fyn in regulating gammadeltaTCR signal strength, PLoS One, 5, e8899, 10.1371/journal.pone.0008899 · DOI
  36. Y Cai, 2011, Pivotal role of dermal IL-17-producing gammadelta T cells in skin inflammation, Immunity, 35, 596, 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.001 · DOI
  37. B Becher, 2012, Hiding under the skin: Interleukin-17-producing gammadelta T cells go under the skin?, Nat Med, 18, 1748, 10.1038/nm.3016 · DOI
  38. S Pantelyushin, 2012, Rorgammat+ innate lymphocytes and gammadelta T cells initiate psoriasiform plaque formation in mice, J Clin Invest, 122, 2252, 10.1172/JCI61862 · DOI
  39. EF Lind, 2001, Mapping precursor movement through the postnatal thymus reveals specific microenvironments supporting defined stages of early lymphoid development, J Exp Med, 194, 127, 10.1084/jem.194.2.127 · DOI · Paper page
  40. J Plotkin, 2003, Critical role for CXCR4 signaling in progenitor localization and T cell differentiation in the postnatal thymus, J Immunol, 171, 4521, 10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4521 · DOI
  41. T Ara, 2003, A role of CXC chemokine ligand 12/stromal cell-derived factor-1/pre-B cell growth stimulating factor and its receptor CXCR4 in fetal and adult T cell development in vivo, J Immunol, 170, 4649, 10.4049/jimmunol.170.9.4649 · DOI
  42. DD Billadeau, 2007, Regulation of T-cell activation by the cytoskeleton, Nat Rev Immunol, 7, 131, 10.1038/nri2021 · DOI
  43. AT Ritter, 2013, The role of the cytoskeleton at the immunological synapse, Immunol Rev, 256, 107, 10.1111/imr.12117 · DOI
  44. TJ Thauland, 2017, Cytoskeletal adaptivity regulates T cell receptor signaling, Sci Signal, 10, 10.1126/scisignal.aah3737 · DOI
  45. HJ Fehling, 1995, Crucial role of the pre-T-cell receptor alpha gene in development of alpha beta but not gamma delta T cells, Nature, 375, 795, 10.1038/375795a0 · DOI
  46. M Malissen, 1995, Altered T cell development in mice with a targeted mutation of the CD3-epsilon gene, EMBO J, 14, 4641, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00146.x · DOI
  47. H vonBoehmer, 1995, Control of T-cell development by the Pre-T and alpha beta T-cell, Receptor Activation by Antigens, Cytokines, Hormones, and Growth Factors, 766, 52
  48. I Aifantis, 2006, Regulation of T-cell progenitor survival and cell-cycle entry by the pre-T-cell receptor, Immunol Rev, 209, 159, 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00343.x · DOI
  49. P Zarin, 2015, Gamma delta T-cell differentiation and effector function programming, TCR signal strength, when and how much?, Cell Immunol, 296, 70, 10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.03.007 · DOI
  50. D Sakata, 2007, Impaired T lymphocyte trafficking in mice deficient in an actin-nucleating protein, mDia1, J Exp Med, 204, 2031, 10.1084/jem.20062647 · DOI
  51. SC Morley, 2010, The actin-bundling protein L-plastin dissociates CCR7 proximal signaling from CCR7-induced motility, J Immunol, 184, 3628, 10.4049/jimmunol.0903851 · DOI
  52. N Foger, 2006, Requirement for coronin 1 in T lymphocyte trafficking and cellular homeostasis, Science, 313, 839, 10.1126/science.1130563 · DOI
  53. LR Shiow, 2008, The actin regulator coronin 1A is mutant in a thymic egress-deficient mouse strain and in a patient with severe combined immunodeficiency, Nat Immunol, 9, 1307, 10.1038/ni.1662 · DOI · Paper page
  54. J Zhang, 1999, Antigen receptor-induced activation and cytoskeletal rearrangement are impaired in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein-deficient lymphocytes, Journal of Experimental Medicine, 190, 1329, 10.1084/jem.190.9.1329 · DOI
  55. SB Snapper, 1998, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein-deficient mice reveal a role for WASP in T but not B cell activation, Immunity, 9, 81, 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80590-7 · DOI
  56. JY Zhang, 2002, WASp verprolin homology, cofilin homology, and acidic region domain-mediated actin polymerization is required for T cell development, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99, 2240, 10.1073/pnas.042686099 · DOI
  57. K El Malki, 2013, An alternative pathway of imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation in the absence of interleukin-17 receptor a signaling, J Invest Dermatol, 133, 441, 10.1038/jid.2012.318 · DOI
  58. M Kondo, 1997, Identification of clonogenic common lymphoid progenitors in mouse bone marrow, Cell, 91, 661, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80453-5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Seeland, I., Xiong, Y., Orlik, C., Deibel, D., Prokosch, S., Küblbeck, G., Jahraus, B., De Stefano, D., Moos, S., Kurschus, F. C., Arnold, B., & Samstag, Y.
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2018-07-09
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
e2005380
ISSN
1545-7885
Cited by
12
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review