Cited by 27LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Visible name changes promote inequity for transgender researchers

Open access
Gaskins, Leo Chan, McClain, Craig R.·2021·PLOS Biology

Abstract

Allowing for invisible name changes is a matter of dignity for trans researchers. This would prevent their own publication record from outing them without their consent. A single, centralized name change request through ORCID iD would alleviate the burden of changing each publication individually.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001104

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many academics and researchers have bemoaned the glacial adaptation to name changes and the resulting trans-exclusive inequity in publishing records.

    “In fact, many academics and researchers have bemoaned the glacial adaptation to name changes and the resulting trans-exclusive inequity in publishing records [34, 49, 105].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Cech EA, editor. LGBT professionals’ workplace experiences in STEM-related federal agencies. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2015.
  2. [2]Cech EA, Pham MV. Queer in STEM organizations: Workplace disadvantages for LGBT employees in STEM related federal agencies. Soc Sci. 2017; 6(1): 12. PMC10978046 38550541
  3. [5]Yoder JB, Mattheis A. Queer in STEM: Workplace experiences reported in a national survey of LGBTQA individuals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. J Homosex. 2016; 63(1): 1– 27. 10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632 26241115 · DOI
  4. [8]Pollitt AM, Ioverno S, Russell ST, Li G, Grossman AH. Predictors and mental health benefits of chosen name use among transgender youth. Youth Soc. 2019. 10.1177/0044118X19855898 33223575 PMC7678041 · DOI
  5. [9]Shipherd JC, Berke D, Livingston NA. Trauma Recovery in the Transgender and Gender Diverse Community: Extensions of the Minority Stress Model for Treatment Planning. Cogn Behav Pract. 2019; 26(4): 629– 46.
  6. [11]Rivera LA. When two bodies are (not) a problem: Gender and relationship status discrimination in academic hiring. Am Sociol Rev. 2017; 82(6): 1111– 38.
  7. [12]Driskell KM. Identity confidentiality for women fleeing domestic violence. Hastings Womens Law J. 2009; 20: 129.
  8. [13]Knope S. Name Changes and Related Options for Domestic Violence Victims. US Attys Bull. 1999; 47: 49.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaskins, L. C., & McClain, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium (US)
Corresponding author
Gaskins, Leo Chan
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2021-03-09
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
e3001104
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W3134579308
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
name change, ORCID iD, publication records, outing, research integrity, gender identity
MeSH terms
Scholarly Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Names, Research Personnel, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review