The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Fragment-Based Binding Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation
Open accessAbstract
Fragment-based drug discovery using NMR and x-ray crystallographic methods has proven utility but also non-trivial time, materials, and labor costs. Current computational fragment-based approaches circumvent these issues but suffer from limited representations of protein flexibility and solvation effects, leading to difficulties with rigorous ranking of fragment affinities. To overcome these limitations we describe an explicit solvent all-atom molecular dynamics methodology (SILCS: Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation) that uses small aliphatic and aromatic molecules plus water molecules to map the affinity pattern of a protein for hydrophobic groups, aromatic groups, hydrogen bond donors, and hydrogen bond acceptors. By simultaneously incorporating ligands representative of all these functionalities, the method is an in silico free energy-based competition assay that generates three-dimensional probability maps of fragment binding (FragMaps) indicating favorable fragment:protein interactions. Applied to the two-fold symmetric oncoprotein BCL-6, the SILCS method yields two-fold symmetric FragMaps that recapitulate the crystallographic binding modes of the SMRT and BCOR peptides. These FragMaps account both for important sequence and structure differences in the C-terminal halves of the two peptides and also the high mobility of the BCL-6 His116 sidechain in the peptide-binding groove. Such SILCS FragMaps can be used to qualitatively inform the design of small-molecule inhibitors or as scoring grids for high-throughput in silico docking that incorporate both an atomic-level description of solvation and protein flexibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream
Arkin, M. R., & Wells, J. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1343 · Cited by 1,705
Calculation of absolute protein–ligand binding free energy from computer simulations
Woo, H.-J., & Roux, B. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409005102 · Cited by 661
Predicting Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energies to a Simple Model Site
Mobley, D. L., Graves, A. P., Chodera, J. D., McReynolds, A. C., Shoichet, B. K., & Dill, K. A. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.002 · Cited by 310
Cited by
Next generation 3D pharmacophore modeling
Schaller, D., Šribar, D., Noonan, T., Deng, L., Nguyen, T. N., Pach, S., Machalz, D., Bermudez, M., & Wolber, G. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1468 · Cited by 269
Rationally designed BCL6 inhibitors target activated B cell diffuse large B cell lymphoma
Cardenas, M. G., Yu, W., Beguelin, W., Teater, M. R., Geng, H., Goldstein, R. L., Oswald, E., Hatzi, K., Yang, S.-N., Cohen, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci85795 · Cited by 176
Self-citationThe Free Energy Landscape of Small Molecule Unbinding
Huang, D., & Caflisch, A. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002002 · Cited by 116
“Only recently, explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been used to investigate the binding of small fragments to proteins at atomistic level of detail, which is very helpful for the design of small-molecule inhibitors [5,6,7,8].”
BackgroundCao, X., Yap, J. L., Newell-Rogers, M. K., Peddaboina, C., Jiang, W., Papaconstantinou, H. T., Jupitor, D., Rai, A., Jung, K.-Y., Tubin, R. P., et al. (2013) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/1476-4598-12-42 · Cited by 87
Self-citationStructural and thermodynamic framework for PIEZO1 modulation by small molecules
Jiang, W., Wijerathne, T. D., Zhang, H., Lin, Y.-C., Jo, S., Im, W., Lacroix, J. J., & Luo, Y. L. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2310933120 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Guvench, O., & MacKerell, A. D.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-07-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1000435
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2019048640
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Fragment-Based Binding Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000435
- The paper
- Guvench, O., & MacKerell, A. D. (2009). Computational Fragment-Based Binding Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.