The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Organized Criticality in Developing Neuronal Networks
Open accessAbstract
Recently evidence has accumulated that many neural networks exhibit self-organized criticality. In this state, activity is similar across temporal scales and this is beneficial with respect to information flow. If subcritical, activity can die out, if supercritical epileptiform patterns may occur. Little is known about how developing networks will reach and stabilize criticality. Here we monitor the development between 13 and 95 days in vitro (DIV) of cortical cell cultures (n = 20) and find four different phases, related to their morphological maturation: An initial low-activity state (≈19 DIV) is followed by a supercritical (≈20 DIV) and then a subcritical one (≈36 DIV) until the network finally reaches stable criticality (≈58 DIV). Using network modeling and mathematical analysis we describe the dynamics of the emergent connectivity in such developing systems. Based on physiological observations, the synaptic development in the model is determined by the drive of the neurons to adjust their connectivity for reaching on average firing rate homeostasis. We predict a specific time course for the maturation of inhibition, with strong onset and delayed pruning, and that total synaptic connectivity should be strongly linked to the relative levels of excitation and inhibition. These results demonstrate that the interplay between activity and connectivity guides developing networks into criticality suggesting that this may be a generic and stable state of many networks in vivo and in vitro.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the dynamics of the spontaneous activity in neuronal networks
Mazzoni, A., Broccard, F. D., Garcia-Perez, E., Bonifazi, P., Ruaro, M. E., & Torre, V. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000439 · Cited by 279
Characterizing neuronal activity by describing the membrane potential as a stochastic process.
Pospischil, M., Piwkowska, Z., Bal, T., & Destexhe, A. (2009) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.05.010 · Cited by 7
Cited by
Trujillo, C. A., Gao, R., Negraes, P. D., Gu, J., Buchanan, J., Preissl, S., Wang, A., Wu, W., Haddad, G. G., Chaim, I. A., et al. (2019) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.002 · Cited by 974
The Functional Benefits of Criticality in the Cortex
Shew, W. L., & Plenz, D. (2013) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858412445487 · Cited by 607
Being Critical of Criticality in the Brain
Beggs, J. M., & Timme, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00163 · Cited by 494
Self-organized criticality as a fundamental property of neural systems
Hesse, J., & Gross, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00166 · Cited by 440
Mohan, H., Verhoog, M. B., Doreswamy, K. K., Eyal, G., Aardse, R., Lodder, B. N., Goriounova, N. A., Asamoah, B., B. Brakspear, A. B. C., Groot, C., et al. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv188 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Tetzlaff, C., Okujeni, S., Egert, U., Wörgötter, F., & Butz, M.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-12-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1001013
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2396075472
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-Organized Criticality in Developing Neuronal Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001013
- The paper
- Tetzlaff, C., Okujeni, S., Egert, U., Wörgötter, F., & Butz, M. (2010). Self-Organized Criticality in Developing Neuronal Networks. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.