Cited by 7Neural dynamics and brain functionstochastic dynamics and bifurcationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Characterizing neuronal activity by describing the membrane potential as a stochastic process.

Pospischil, Martin, Piwkowska, Zuzanna, Bal, Thierry, Destexhe, Alain·2009·Journal of Physiology-Paris

Abstract

Cortical neurons behave similarly to stochastic processes, as a consequence of their irregularity and dense connectivity. Their firing pattern is close to a Poisson process, and their membrane potential (V(m)) is analogous to colored noise. One way to characterize this activity is to identify V(m) to a multidimensional stochastic process. We review here this approach and how it can be used to extract important statistical signatures of neuronal activity. The "VmD method" consists of fitting the V(m) distribution obtained intracellularly to analytic expressions derived from stochastic processes, and thereby deduce synaptic conductance parameters. However, this method requires at least two levels of V(m), which prevents applications to single-trial measurements. We also discuss methods that can be applied to single V(m) traces, such as power spectral analysis and the "STA method" to calculate spike-triggered average conductances based on a maximum likelihood procedure. A recently proposed method, the "VmT method", is based on the fusion of these two concepts. This method is analogous to the VmD method and estimates the mean excitatory and inhibitory conductances and their variances. However, it does so by using a maximum-likelihood estimation, and can thus be applied to single V(m) traces. All methods were tested using controlled conductance injection in dynamic-clamp experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.05.010

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pospischil, M., Piwkowska, Z., Bal, T., & Destexhe, A.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
103
Issue
1-2
Pages
98-106
ISSN
0928-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145735014
Cited by
7
References
44
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physiology-Paris (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
neuronal membrane potential, stochastic processes, colored noise, power spectrum analysis, maximum likelihood estimation, dynamic clamp, single-trial analysis, cortical neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Membrane Potentials, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Stochastic Processes, Visual Cortex, Neural Networks, Computer, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Synaptic Potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review