The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Use of Human Mobility Proxies for Modeling Epidemics
Open accessAbstract
Human mobility is a key component of large-scale spatial-transmission models of infectious diseases. Correctly modeling and quantifying human mobility is critical for improving epidemic control, but may be hindered by data incompleteness or unavailability. Here we explore the opportunity of using proxies for individual mobility to describe commuting flows and predict the diffusion of an influenza-like-illness epidemic. We consider three European countries and the corresponding commuting networks at different resolution scales, obtained from (i) official census surveys, (ii) proxy mobility data extracted from mobile phone call records, and (iii) the radiation model calibrated with census data. Metapopulation models defined on these countries and integrating the different mobility layers are compared in terms of epidemic observables. We show that commuting networks from mobile phone data capture the empirical commuting patterns well, accounting for more than 87% of the total fluxes. The distributions of commuting fluxes per link from mobile phones and census sources are similar and highly correlated, however a systematic overestimation of commuting traffic in the mobile phone data is observed. This leads to epidemics that spread faster than on census commuting networks, once the mobile phone commuting network is considered in the epidemic model, however preserving to a high degree the order of infection of newly affected locations. Proxies' calibration affects the arrival times' agreement across different models, and the observed topological and traffic discrepancies among mobility sources alter the resulting epidemic invasion patterns. Results also suggest that proxies perform differently in approximating commuting patterns for disease spread at different resolution scales, with the radiation model showing higher accuracy than mobile phone data when the seed is central in the network, the opposite being observed for peripheral locations. Proxies should therefore be chosen in light of the desired accuracy for the epidemic situation under study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility
Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N., & Barabási, A.-L. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177170 · Cited by 3,234
Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility
de Montjoye, Y.-A., Hidalgo, C. A., Verleysen, M., & Blondel, V. D. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01376 · Cited by 1,645
Self-citationOrtúzar, J. D. D., & Willumsen, L. G. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781119993308 · Cited by 1,220
Quantifying the Impact of Human Mobility on Malaria
Wesolowski, A., Eagle, N., Tatem, A. J., Smith, D. L., Noor, A. M., Snow, R. W., & Buckee, C. O. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223467 · Cited by 992
Bengtsson, L., Lu, X., Thorson, A., Garfield, R., & von Schreeb, J. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001083 · Cited by 634
Cited by
Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer’s disease
Vogt, N. M., Kerby, R. L., Dill-McFarland, K. A., Harding, S. J., Merluzzi, A. P., Johnson, S. C., Carlsson, C. M., Asthana, S., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13601-y · Cited by 2,137
Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus
Kraemer, M. U. G., Reiner, R. C., Brady, O. J., Messina, J. P., Gilbert, M., Pigott, D. M., Yi, D., Johnson, K., Earl, L., Marczak, L. B., et al. (2019) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-019-0376-y · Cited by 1,382
Statistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle
Oliver, N., Lepri, B., Sterly, H., Lambiotte, R., Deletaille, S., De Nadai, M., Letouzé, E., Salah, A. A., Benjamins, R., Cattuto, C., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc0764 · Cited by 631
Self-citationNew technologies in predicting, preventing and controlling emerging infectious diseases
Christaki, E. (2015) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2015.1040975 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Tizzoni, M., Bajardi, P., Decuyper, A., Kon Kam King, G., Schneider, C. M., Blondel, V., Smoreda, Z., González, M. C., & Colizza, V.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-07-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1003716
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W1882303714
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Use of Human Mobility Proxies for Modeling Epidemics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003716
- The paper
- Tizzoni, M., Bajardi, P., Decuyper, A., Kon Kam King, G., Schneider, C. M., Blondel, V., Smoreda, Z., González, M. C., & Colizza, V. (2014). On the Use of Human Mobility Proxies for Modeling Epidemics. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003716
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.