Cited by 992Malaria Research and ControlHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisTravel-related health issues

Quantifying the Impact of Human Mobility on Malaria

Open access
Wesolowski, Amy, Eagle, Nathan, Tatem, Andrew J., Smith, David L., Noor, Abdisalan M., Snow, Robert W., Buckee, Caroline O.·2012·Science

Abstract

Mobile Phone “Hot Spots”: An obstacle to developing effective national malaria control programs is a lack of understanding of human movements, which are an important component of disease transmission. As mobile phones have become increasingly ubiquitous, it is now possible to collect individual-level, longitudinal data on human movements on a massive scale. Wesolowski et al. (p. 267 ) analyzed mobile phone call data records representing the travel patterns of 15 million mobile phone owners in Kenya over the course of a year. This was combined with a detailed malaria risk map, to estimate malaria parasite movements across the country that could be caused by human movement. This information enabled detailed analysis of parasite sources and sinks between hundreds of local settlements. Estimates were compared with hospital data from Nairobi to show that local pockets of transmission likely occur around the periphery of Nairobi, accounting for locally acquired cases, contrary to the accepted idea that there is no transmission in the capital.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1223467

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human mobility plays an important role in the transmission of vector-borne diseases, as population movements lead to continuous pathogen reintroductions.

    “Yet, human mobility plays an important role in the transmission of vector‐borne diseases, as population movements lead to continuous pathogen reintroductions (Buckee et al., 2013; Wesolowski et al., 2012).”

    From Spatial Optimization Methods for Malaria Risk Mapping in Sub‐Saharan African Cities Using Demographic and Health Surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Wesolowski et al., 2012

    The paper’s discussion of malaria parasite dispersal (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) says human travel can spread parasites and that frequent introductions of imported parasites could undermine control. This supports the claim for malaria, but the paper does not establish continuous reintroductions across vector-borne diseases generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pathogen transmission by mosquitoes has been characterized as being highly local and focal, with transmission foci and hotspots.

    “Pathogen transmission by mosquitoes has been characterized as being highly local and focal, with transmission foci and hotspots.75”

    From Recasting the theory of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission dynamics and control (2014) · cites this paper as [75]

    The paper describes malaria transmission hotspots occurring on an “extremely local scale” and identifies foci of transmission around Lake Victoria and the coast. This supports the characterization for malaria, but the claim extends it to mosquito-borne pathogens generally, which the paper does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent evidence suggests that human social networks are just as important for transmission within cities as mosquito ecology, and that movement networks are a critical element of transmission within and among countries.

    “Recent evidence suggests that human social networks are just as important for transmission within cities as mosquito ecology,108 and that movement networks are a critical element of transmission within and among countries.109,110”

    From Recasting the theory of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission dynamics and control (2014) · cites this paper as [110]

    The paper’s Abstract section identifies human travel as a driver of parasite importation between regions of Kenya and says international migrants can contribute to dispersal across Africa. But its analysis does not capture cross-border migration, so it does not establish that movement networks are a critical element of transmission among countries. The separate claim about social networks within cities is attached to citation 108, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mobility has been shown to play a major role in spreading other diseases like malaria-people travelling to different cities carry the parasite and infect the mosquitoes there and in turn the population.

    “Apart from the above infectious diseases, mobility has been shown to play a major role in spreading other diseases like malaria [111]—people travelling to different cities carry the parasite and infect the mosquitoes there and in turn the population.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Rapuoda B Achola P Study on malaria and its vectors in Nairobi: a review of the distribution of the vectors and the prevalence of the disease KEMRI/KETRI 5th Annual Medical Scientific Conference, Nairobi, Kenya 1984 115 119

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wesolowski, A., Eagle, N., Tatem, A. J., Smith, D. L., Noor, A. M., Snow, R. W., & Buckee, C. O.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Buckee, Caroline O.
Venue
Science
Published
2012-10-12
Volume
338
Issue
6104
Pages
267-270
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1994682066
Cited by
992
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 3
FWCI
50.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (095127, 092654, 079080)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM088558)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI089674)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
Keywords
malaria, human mobility, mobile phone data, malaria transmission, malaria risk mapping, Nairobi, local transmission, malaria control
MeSH terms
Animals, Communicable Disease Control, Humans, Kenya, Culicidae, Plasmodium falciparum, Travel, Prevalence, Malaria, Falciparum, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review