The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FireProt: Energy- and Evolution-Based Computational Design of Thermostable Multiple-Point Mutants
Open accessAbstract
There is great interest in increasing proteins' stability to enhance their utility as biocatalysts, therapeutics, diagnostics and nanomaterials. Directed evolution is a powerful, but experimentally strenuous approach. Computational methods offer attractive alternatives. However, due to the limited reliability of predictions and potentially antagonistic effects of substitutions, only single-point mutations are usually predicted in silico, experimentally verified and then recombined in multiple-point mutants. Thus, substantial screening is still required. Here we present FireProt, a robust computational strategy for predicting highly stable multiple-point mutants that combines energy- and evolution-based approaches with smart filtering to identify additive stabilizing mutations. FireProt's reliability and applicability was demonstrated by validating its predictions against 656 mutations from the ProTherm database. We demonstrate that thermostability of the model enzymes haloalkane dehalogenase DhaA and γ-hexachlorocyclohexane dehydrochlorinase LinA can be substantially increased (ΔTm = 24°C and 21°C) by constructing and characterizing only a handful of multiple-point mutants. FireProt can be applied to any protein for which a tertiary structure and homologous sequences are available, and will facilitate the rapid development of robust proteins for biomedical and biotechnological applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Whelan, S., & Goldman, N. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 · Cited by 2,849
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728
Cited by
Advances in protein structure prediction and design
Kuhlman, B., & Bradley, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0163-x · Cited by 806
Cui, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, X., Dong, S., Tian, Y., Qiao, Y., Mitra, R., Han, J., Li, C., Han, X., et al. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c05126 · Cited by 580
FoldX as Protein Engineering Tool: Better Than Random Based Approaches?
Buß, O., Rudat, J., & Ochsenreither, K. (2018) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2018.01.002 · Cited by 284
Transfer learning to leverage larger datasets for improved prediction of protein stability changes
Dieckhaus, H., Brocidiacono, M., Randolph, N. Z., & Kuhlman, B. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314853121 · Cited by 205
Assessing and enhancing foldability in designed proteins
Listov, D., Lipsh‐Sokolik, R., Rosset, S., Yang, C., Correia, B. E., & Fleishman, S. J. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4400 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Bednar, D., Beerens, K., Sebestova, E., Bendl, J., Khare, S., Chaloupkova, R., Prokop, Z., Brezovsky, J., Baker, D., & Damborsky, J.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-11-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e1004556
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2123906667
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FireProt: Energy- and Evolution-Based Computational Design of Thermostable Multiple-Point Mutants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004556
- The paper
- Bednar, D., Beerens, K., Sebestova, E., Bendl, J., Khare, S., Chaloupkova, R., Prokop, Z., Brezovsky, J., Baker, D., & Damborsky, J. (2015). FireProt: Energy- and Evolution-Based Computational Design of Thermostable Multiple-Point Mutants. PLOS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.