The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the Semantic Web for Rapid Integration of WikiPathways with Other Biological Online Data Resources
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nanopublication model has been used to represent statements from different fields, especially in the life science domain.
“The nanopublication model has been used to represent statements from different fields, especially in the life science domain.”
From Provenance-driven nanopublications: representing source lineage and trust networks for multi-source assertions (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
The Introduction describes representing WikiPathways content as triple-based statements about biological entities, and Materials and Methods describes RDF guidelines for biomedical data. Neither passage addresses the nanopublication model or its use across different fields; searches for “nanopublication” and related terms found no passage that does. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systems biology markup language: Level 2 and beyond
Finney, A., & Hucka, M. (2003) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0311472 · Cited by 187
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- DGJ Jennen, 2010, Biotransformation pathway maps in wikipathways enable direct visualization of drug metabolism related expression changes, Drug Discov Today, 15, 851, 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.08.002 · DOI
- P Khatri, 2012, Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges, PLoS Comput Biol, 8, e1002375, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002375 · DOI
- MP van Iersel, 2008, Presenting and exploring biological pathways with PathVisio, BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 399, 10.1186/1471-2105-9-399 · DOI
- T Kelder, 2010, Finding the right questions: exploratory pathway analysis to enhance biological discovery in large datasets, PLoS Biol, 8, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000472 · DOI
- T Kelder, 2012, WikiPathways: building research communities on biological pathways, Nucleic Acids Res, 40, D1301, 10.1093/nar/gkr1074 · DOI
- M Kutmon, 2016, WikiPathways: capturing the full diversity of pathway knowledge, Nucleic Acids Research, 44, D488, 10.1093/nar/gkv1024 · DOI
- D Maglott, 2011, Entrez gene: gene-centered information at NCBI, Nucleic Acids Research, 39, D52, 10.1093/nar/gkq1237 · DOI
- A Yates, 2016, Ensembl 2016, Nucleic Acids Research, 44, D710, 10.1093/nar/gkv1157 · DOI
- 2015, UniProt: a hub for protein information, Nucleic Acids Research, 43, D204, 10.1093/nar/gku989 · DOI · Paper page
- DS Wishart, 2013, HMDB 3.0—The human metabolome database in 2013, Nucleic Acids Research, 41, D801, 10.1093/nar/gks1065 · DOI
- HE Pence, 2010, ChemSpider: An online chemical information resource, J Chem Educ, 87, 1123, 10.1021/ed100697w · DOI
- S Kim, 2016, PubChem substance and compound databases, Nucleic Acids Research, 44, D1202, 10.1093/nar/gkv951 · DOI · Paper page
- AP Bento, 2014, The ChEMBL bioactivity database: an update, Nucleic Acids Research, 42, D1083, 10.1093/nar/gkt1031 · DOI
- MP van Iersel, 2010, The BridgeDb framework: standardized access to gene, protein and metabolite identifier mapping services, BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 5, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-5 · DOI
- N Juty, 2012, Identifiers.org and MIRIAM Registry: community resources to provide persistent identification, Nucleic Acids Res, 40, D580, 10.1093/nar/gkr1097 · DOI
- J Piñero, 2015, DisGeNET: a discovery platform for the dynamical exploration of human diseases and their genes, Database, 2015, bav028+, 10.1093/database/bav028 · DOI · Paper page
- JS Luciano, 2005, Pax of mind for pathway researchers, Drug Discov Today, 10, 937, 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03501-4 · DOI
- N Le Novere, 2009, The Systems Biology Graphical Notation, Nat Biotechnol, 27, 735, 10.1038/nbt.1558 · DOI · Paper page
- KW Kohn, 2006, Molecular interaction maps of bioregulatory networks: a general rubric for systems biology, Mol Biol Cell, 17, 1, 10.1091/mbc.E05-09-0824 · DOI
- N Juty, 2015, BioModels: Content, Features, Functionality and Use, CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
- A Luna, 2011, PathVisio-MIM: PathVisio plugin for creating and editing Molecular Interaction Maps (MIMs), Bioinformatics, 27, 2165, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr336 · DOI
- J Ratnam, 2014, The application of the open pharmacological concepts triple store (open PHACTS) to support drug discovery research, PLoS ONE, 9, e115460, 10.1371/journal.pone.0115460 · DOI
- Halpin H, Hayes PJ, McCusker JP, McGuinness DL, Thompson HS (2010) When owl:sameAs Isn’t the Same: An Analysis of Identity in Linked Data. In: International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, volume 6496 of LNCS, pp. 305–320. · DOI
- A Bohler, 2015, Automatically visualise and analyse data on pathways using PathVisioRPC from any programming environment, BMC Bioinformatics, 16, 267, 10.1186/s12859-015-0708-8 · DOI
- EG Cerami, 2011, Pathway commons, a web resource for biological pathway data, Nucleic Acids Research, 39, D685, 10.1093/nar/gkq1039 · DOI · Paper page
- AJ Williams, 2012, Open PHACTS: semantic interoperability for drug discovery, Drug Discovery Today, 17, 1188, 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.05.016 · DOI · Paper page
- B McBride, 2002, Jena: a semantic web toolkit, Internet Computing, IEEE, 6, 55, 10.1109/MIC.2002.1067737 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menotti, L., Marchesin, S., Giachelle, F., & Silvello, G. (2025) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-025-00431-x · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Waagmeester, A., Kutmon, M., Riutta, A., Miller, R., Willighagen, E. L., Evelo, C. T., & Pico, A. R.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-06-23
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e1004989
- ISSN
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC4918977
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Innovative Medicines Initiative (no115191)
- National Institutes of Health (R01-GM100039)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review