Cited by 257Computational Drug Discovery MethodsTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Representability of algebraic topology for biomolecules in machine learning based scoring and virtual screening

Open access
Cang, Zixuan, Mu, Lin, Wei, Guo-Wei·2018·PLOS Computational Biology

Abstract

This work introduces a number of algebraic topology approaches, including multi-component persistent homology, multi-level persistent homology, and electrostatic persistence for the representation, characterization, and description of small molecules and biomolecular complexes. In contrast to the conventional persistent homology, multi-component persistent homology retains critical chemical and biological information during the topological simplification of biomolecular geometric complexity. Multi-level persistent homology enables a tailored topological description of inter- and/or intra-molecular interactions of interest. Electrostatic persistence incorporates partial charge information into topological invariants. These topological methods are paired with Wasserstein distance to characterize similarities between molecules and are further integrated with a variety of machine learning algorithms, including k-nearest neighbors, ensemble of trees, and deep convolutional neural networks, to manifest their descriptive and predictive powers for protein-ligand binding analysis and virtual screening of small molecules. Extensive numerical experiments involving 4,414 protein-ligand complexes from the PDBBind database and 128,374 ligand-target and decoy-target pairs in the DUD database are performed to test respectively the scoring power and the discriminatory power of the proposed topological learning strategies. It is demonstrated that the present topological learning outperforms other existing methods in protein-ligand binding affinity prediction and ligand-decoy discrimination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005929

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [35]Shi X, Koehl P. Geometry and topology for modeling biomolecular surfaces. Far East J Applied Math. 2011; 50: 1– 34.
  2. [118]Kasson PM, Zomorodian A, Park S, Singhal N, Guibas LJ, Pande VS. Persistent voids: a new structural metric for membrane fusion. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(14): 1753– 1759. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm250 17488753 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cang, Z., Mu, L., & Wei, G.-W.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Wei, Guo-Wei
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
e1005929
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2963833291
Cited by
257
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DMS-1721024, IIS-1302285)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
algebraic topology, persistent homology, Wasserstein distance, protein-ligand binding affinity prediction, virtual screening, biomolecular complexes, PDBbind
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Ligands, Models, Neurological, Nucleic Acids, Protein Binding, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Area Under Curve, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein, Static Electricity, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review