Predicting mean ribosome load for 5’UTR of any length using deep learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The 5’ untranslated region plays a key role in regulating mRNA translation and consequently protein abundance. Therefore, accurate modeling of 5’UTR regulatory sequences shall provide insights into translational control mechanisms and help interpret genetic variants. Recently, a model was trained on a massively parallel reporter assay to predict mean ribosome load (MRL)—a proxy for translation rate—directly from 5’UTR sequence with a high degree of accuracy. However, this model is restricted to sequence lengths investigated in the reporter assay and therefore cannot be applied to the majority of human sequences without a substantial loss of information. Here, we introduced frame pooling, a novel neural network operation that enabled the development of an MRL prediction model for 5’UTRs of any length. Our model shows state-of-the-art performance on fixed length randomized sequences, while offering better generalization performance on longer sequences and on a variety of translation-related genome-wide datasets. Variant interpretation is demonstrated on a 5’UTR variant of the gene HBB associated with beta-thalassemia. Frame pooling could find applications in other bioinformatics predictive tasks. Moreover, our model, released open source, could help pinpoint pathogenic genetic variants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, mRNA abundance, while very helpful, is often not sufficient to accurately predict protein abundance [1–5].”
BackgroundMass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome
Wilhelm, M., Schlegl, J., Hahne, H., Gholami, A. M., Lieberenz, M., Savitski, M. M., Ziegler, E., Butzmann, L., Gessulat, S., Marx, H., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13319 · Cited by 1,820 · see citing works
Base-resolution models of transcription-factor binding reveal soft motif syntax
Avsec, Ž., Weilert, M., Shrikumar, A., Krueger, S., Alexandari, A., Dalal, K., Fropf, R., McAnany, C., Gagneur, J., Kundaje, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00782-6 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay
Sample, P. J., Wang, B., Reid, D. W., Presnyak, V., McFadyen, I. J., Morris, D. R., & Seelig, G. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0164-5 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predicting the translation efficiency of messenger RNA in mammalian cells
Zheng, D., Persyn, L., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Ulloa-Montoya, F., Cenik, C., & Agarwal, V. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-025-02712-x · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karollus, A., Avsec, Ž., & Gagneur, J.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Helmholtz Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gagneur, Julien
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2021-05-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e1008982
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC8136849
- OpenAlex
- W3163562839
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2021-05-20)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IS18053F)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- 5' untranslated region, translation rate, neural network architecture, massively parallel reporter assay, translational regulation, variant interpretation, beta-thalassemia, HBB, protein abundance
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Ribosomes, RNA, Messenger, 5' Untranslated Regions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review