Cited by 12Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multienzyme deep learning models improve peptide de novo sequencing by mass spectrometry proteomics

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Generating and analyzing overlapping peptides through multienzymatic digestion is an efficient procedure for de novo protein using from bottom-up mass spectrometry (MS). Despite improved instrumentation and software, de novo MS data analysis remains challenging. In recent years, deep learning models have represented a performance breakthrough. Incorporating that technology into de novo protein sequencing workflows require machine-learning models capable of handling highly diverse MS data. In this study, we analyzed the requirements for assembling such generalizable deep learning models by systemcally varying the composition and size of the training set. We assessed the generated models’ performances using two test sets composed of peptides originating from the multienzyme digestion of samples from various species. The peptide recall values on the test sets showed that the deep learning models generated from a collection of highly N- and C-termini diverse peptides generalized 76% more over the termini-restricted ones. Moreover, expanding the training set’s size by adding peptides from the multienzymatic digestion with five proteases of several species samples led to a 2–3 fold generalizability gain. Furthermore, we tested the applicability of these multienzyme deep learning (MEM) models by fully de novo sequencing the heavy and light monomeric chains of five commercial antibodies (mAbs). MEMs extracted over 10000 matching and overlapped peptides across six different proteases mAb samples, achieving a 100% sequence coverage for 8 of the ten polypeptide chains. We foretell that the MEMs’ proven improvements to de novo analysis will positively impact several applications, such as analyzing samples of high complexity, unknown nature, or the peptidomics field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010457

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. X Han, 2008, Mass spectrometry for proteomics, Curr Opin Chem Biol, 12, 483, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.07.024 · DOI
  2. LV Schaffer, 2019, Identification and quantification of proteoforms by mass spectrometry, Proteomics, 19, e1800361, 10.1002/pmic.201800361 · DOI · Paper page
  3. F Palm, 2022, Distinct Serotypes of Streptococcal M Proteins Mediate Fibrinogen-Dependent Platelet Activation and Proinflammatory Effects, Infect Immun, 90, e0046221, 10.1128/iai.00462-21 · DOI
  4. S Chowdhury, 2021, Streptococcus pyogenes Forms Serotype- and Local Environment-Dependent Interspecies Protein Complexes, mSystems, 6, e0027121, 10.1128/mSystems.00271-21 · DOI
  5. A Gómez Toledo, 2021, A systems view of the heparan sulfate interactome, J Histochem Cytochem, 69, 105, 10.1369/0022155420988661 · DOI
  6. W Bahnan, 2021, Spike-Dependent Opsonization Indicates Both Dose-Dependent Inhibition of Phagocytosis and That Non-Neutralizing Antibodies Can Confer Protection to SARS-CoV-2., Front Immunol, 12, 808932, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808932 · DOI
  7. H Khakzad, 2020, In vivo Cross-Linking MS of the Complement System MAC Assembled on Live Gram-Positive Bacteria., Front Genet, 11, 612475, 10.3389/fgene.2020.612475 · DOI
  8. L Happonen, 2019, A quantitative Streptococcus pyogenes-human protein-protein interaction map reveals localization of opsonizing antibodies, Nat Commun, 10, 2727, 10.1038/s41467-019-10583-5 · DOI
  9. H Khakzad, 2021, Structural determination of Streptococcus pyogenes M1 protein interactions with human immunoglobulin G using integrative structural biology, PLoS Comput Biol, 17, e1008169, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008169 · DOI
  10. S Chowdhury, 2020, Structural proteomics, electron cryo-microscopy and structural modeling approaches in bacteria-human protein interactions, Med Microbiol Immunol, 209, 265, 10.1007/s00430-020-00663-5 · DOI
  11. S Hauri, 2019, Rapid determination of quaternary protein structures in complex biological samples, Nat Commun, 10, 192, 10.1038/s41467-018-07986-1 · DOI
  12. K Sjöholm, 2017, Targeted Proteomics and Absolute Protein Quantification for the Construction of a Stoichiometric Host-Pathogen Surface Density Model, Mol Cell Proteomics, 16, S29, 10.1074/mcp.M116.063966 · DOI
  13. L Bundgaard, 2022, Effective protein extraction combined with data independent acquisition analysis reveals a comprehensive and quantifiable insight into the proteomes of articular cartilage and subchondral bone, Osteoarthr Cartil, 30, 137, 10.1016/j.joca.2021.09.006 · DOI
  14. A Bakochi, 2021, Cerebrospinal fluid proteome maps detect pathogen-specific host response patterns in meningitis, eLife, 10
  15. J Fisher, 2021, Proteome Profiling of Recombinant DNase Therapy in Reducing NETs and Aiding Recovery in COVID-19 Patients, Mol Cell Proteomics, 20, 100113, 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100113 · DOI
  16. L Wilk, 2018, Comprehensive Mass Spectrometric Survey of Streptococcus pyogenes Subcellular Proteomes, J Proteome Res, 17, 600, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00701 · DOI
  17. E Malmström, 2016, Large-scale inference of protein tissue origin in gram-positive sepsis plasma using quantitative targeted proteomics, Nat Commun, 7, 10261, 10.1038/ncomms10261 · DOI
  18. JV Olsen, 2004, Trypsin cleaves exclusively C-terminal to arginine and lysine residues, Mol Cell Proteomics, 3, 608, 10.1074/mcp.T400003-MCP200 · DOI
  19. JC Lakbub, 2018, Recent mass spectrometry-based techniques and considerations for disulfide bond characterization in proteins, Anal Bioanal Chem, 410, 2467, 10.1007/s00216-017-0772-1 · DOI
  20. JR Winther, 2014, Quantification of thiols and disulfides, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1840, 838, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.031 · DOI
  21. P Giansanti, 2016, Six alternative proteases for mass spectrometry-based proteomics beyond trypsin, Nat Protoc, 11, 993, 10.1038/nprot.2016.057 · DOI
  22. DL Swaney, 2010, Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics, J Proteome Res, 9, 1323, 10.1021/pr900863u · DOI
  23. H Yang, 2019, Precision De Novo Peptide Sequencing Using Mirror Proteases of Ac-LysargiNase and Trypsin for Large-scale Proteomics, Mol Cell Proteomics, 18, 773, 10.1074/mcp.TIR118.000918 · DOI
  24. D Samodova, 2020, Proalanase is an effective alternative to trypsin for proteomics applications and disulfide bond mapping, Mol Cell Proteomics, 19, 2139, 10.1074/mcp.TIR120.002129 · DOI
  25. R Vitorino, 2020, De novo sequencing of proteins by mass spectrometry, Expert Rev Proteomics, 17, 595, 10.1080/14789450.2020.1831387 · DOI
  26. NH Tran, 2017, De novo peptide sequencing by deep learning, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 114, 8247, 10.1073/pnas.1705691114 · DOI
  27. B Ma, 2003, PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry, Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 17, 2337, 10.1002/rcm.1196 · DOI
  28. B Fischer, 2005, NovoHMM: a hidden Markov model for de novo peptide sequencing, Anal Chem, 77, 7265, 10.1021/ac0508853 · DOI
  29. T Muth, 2018, Evaluating de novo sequencing in proteomics: already an accurate alternative to database-driven peptide identification?, Brief Bioinformatics, 19, 954, 10.1093/bib/bbx033 · DOI
  30. V Dancík, 1999, De novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry, J Comput Biol, 6, 327, 10.1089/106652799318300 · DOI
  31. H Chi, 2013, pNovo+: de novo peptide sequencing using complementary HCD and ETD tandem mass spectra, J Proteome Res, 12, 615, 10.1021/pr3006843 · DOI
  32. H Yang, 2019, pNovo 3: precise de novo peptide sequencing using a learning-to-rank framework, Bioinformatics, 35, i183, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz366 · DOI
  33. A Frank, 2005, PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling, Anal Chem, 77, 964, 10.1021/ac048788h · DOI
  34. B Wen, 2020, Deep learning in proteomics, Proteomics, 20, e1900335, 10.1002/pmic.201900335 · DOI
  35. Y. Tsuruoka, 2019, [deep learning and natural language processing], Brain Nerve, 71, 45
  36. N Kriegeskorte, 2019, Neural network models and deep learning, Curr Biol, 29, R231, 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.034 · DOI
  37. AB Nassif, 2019, Speech recognition using deep neural networks: A systematic review, IEEE Access, 7, 19143, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896880 · DOI
  38. A Vaswani, 2017, Attention Is All You Need, arXiv
  39. R Qiao, 2019, DeepNovoV2: Better de novo peptide sequencing with deep learning., arXiv
  40. A Guthals, 2017, De novo MS/MS sequencing of native human antibodies, J Proteome Res, 16, 45, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00608 · DOI
  41. J Chen, 2017, Proteomic Analysis of Pemphigus Autoantibodies Indicates a Larger, More Diverse, and More Dynamic Repertoire than Determined by B Cell Genetics, Cell Rep, 18, 237, 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.013 · DOI
  42. DR Boutz, 2014, Proteomic identification of monoclonal antibodies from serum, Anal Chem, 86, 4758, 10.1021/ac4037679 · DOI
  43. JK Diedrich, 2013, Energy dependence of HCD on peptide fragmentation: stepped collisional energy finds the sweet spot, J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 24, 1690, 10.1007/s13361-013-0709-7 · DOI
  44. KA Cox, 1996, Role of the site of protonation in the low-energy decompositions of gas-phase peptide ions, J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 7, 522, 10.1016/1044-0305(96)00019-0 · DOI
  45. DL Tabb, 2004, Influence of basic residue content on fragment ion peak intensities in low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides, Anal Chem, 76, 1243, 10.1021/ac0351163 · DOI
  46. WD van Dongen, 1996, Statistical analysis of mass spectral data obtained from singly protonated peptides under high-energy collision-induced dissociation conditions, J Mass Spectrom, 31, 1156, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199610)31:10<1156::AID-JMS407>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  47. JN Arnold, 2007, The impact of glycosylation on the biological function and structure of human immunoglobulins, Annu Rev Immunol, 25, 21, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141702 · DOI
  48. G Zauner, 2013, Glycoproteomic analysis of antibodies, Mol Cell Proteomics, 12, 856, 10.1074/mcp.R112.026005 · DOI
  49. A Castilho, 2015, Processing of complex N-glycans in IgG Fc-region is affected by core fucosylation, MAbs, 7, 863, 10.1080/19420862.2015.1053683 · DOI
  50. J Köster, 2012, Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine, Bioinformatics, 28, 2520, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts480 · DOI · Paper page
  51. LPM Kremer, 2016, Ursgal, Universal Python Module Combining Common Bottom-Up Proteomics Tools for Large-Scale Analysis, J Proteome Res, 15, 788, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00860 · DOI
  52. S Schulze, 2021, Enhancing open modification searches via a combined approach facilitated by ursgal, J Proteome Res, 20, 1986, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00799 · DOI
  53. V Dorfer, 2014, MS Amanda, a universal identification algorithm optimized for high accuracy tandem mass spectra, J Proteome Res, 13, 3679, 10.1021/pr500202e · DOI
  54. JK Eng, 2013, Comet: an open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool, Proteomics, 13, 22, 10.1002/pmic.201200439 · DOI · Paper page
  55. JK Eng, 2015, A deeper look into Comet—implementation and features, J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 26, 1865, 10.1007/s13361-015-1179-x · DOI
  56. DK Schweppe, 2020, Full-Featured, Real-Time Database Searching Platform Enables Fast and Accurate Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics, J Proteome Res, 19, 2026, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00860 · DOI
  57. LY Geer, 2004, Open mass spectrometry search algorithm, J Proteome Res, 3, 958, 10.1021/pr0499491 · DOI
  58. M The, 2016, Fast and Accurate Protein False Discovery Rates on Large-Scale Proteomics Data Sets with Percolator 3.0, J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 27, 1719, 10.1007/s13361-016-1460-7 · DOI · Paper page
  59. AR Jones, 2009, Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines, Proteomics, 9, 1220, 10.1002/pmic.200800473 · DOI
  60. M Mirdita, 2021, ColabFold—Making protein folding accessible to all, BioRxiv
  61. M Steinegger, 2017, MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets, Nat Biotechnol, 35, 1026, 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  62. JK Leman, 2020, Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks., Nat Methods, 17, 665, 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Y Karami, 2019, DaReUS-Loop: a web server to model multiple loops in homology models, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, W423, 10.1093/nar/gkz403 · DOI
  64. EF Pettersen, 2004, UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis, J Comput Chem, 25, 1605, 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gueto-Tettay, C., Tang, D., Happonen, L., Heusel, M., Khakzad, H., Malmström, J., & Malmström, L.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Malmström, Lars
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2023-01-20
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
e1010457
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W4317556129
Cited by
12
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2016.0023)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2020-02419)
  • Alfred Österlunds Stiftelse
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
de novo peptide sequencing, deep learning models, bottom-up mass spectrometry, training data size, model generalization, monoclonal antibodies, antibody heavy and light chains, overlapping peptides, peptidomics
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Peptide Hydrolases, Peptides, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review