Characterization of RNA polymerase II trigger loop mutations using molecular dynamics simulations and machine learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Catalysis and fidelity of multisubunit RNA polymerases rely on a highly conserved active site domain called the trigger loop (TL), which achieves roles in transcription through conformational changes and interaction with NTP substrates. The mutations of TL residues cause distinct effects on catalysis including hypo- and hyperactivity and altered fidelity. We applied molecular dynamics simulation (MD) and machine learning (ML) techniques to characterize TL mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) system. We did so to determine relationships between individual mutations and phenotypes and to associate phenotypes with MD simulated structural alterations. Using fitness values of mutants under various stress conditions, we modeled phenotypes along a spectrum of continual values. We found that ML could predict the phenotypes with 0.68 R 2 correlation from amino acid sequences alone. It was more difficult to incorporate MD data to improve predictions from machine learning, presumably because MD data is too noisy and possibly incomplete to directly infer functional phenotypes. However, a variational auto-encoder model based on the MD data allowed the clustering of mutants with different phenotypes based on structural details. Overall, we found that a subset of loss-of-function (LOF) and lethal mutations tended to increase distances of TL residues to the NTP substrate, while another subset of LOF and lethal substitutions tended to confer an increase in distances between TL and bridge helix (BH). In contrast, some of the gain-of-function (GOF) mutants appear to cause disruption of hydrophobic contacts among TL and nearby helices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Structural Basis of Transcription: RNA Polymerase II at 2.8 Ångstrom Resolution
Cramer, P., Bushnell, D. A., & Kornberg, R. D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1059493 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Structural basis of RNA polymerase II backtracking, arrest and reactivation
Cheung, A. C. M., & Cramer, P. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09785 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
From Structure to Systems: High-Resolution, Quantitative Genetic Analysis of RNA Polymerase II
Braberg, H., Jin, H., Moehle, E. A., Chan, Y. A., Wang, S., Shales, M., Benschop, J. J., Morris, J. H., Qiu, C., Hu, F., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.033 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationActive site opening and closure control translocation of multisubunit RNA polymerase
Malinen, A. M., Turtola, M., Parthiban, M., Vainonen, L., Johnson, M. S., & Belogurov, G. A. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks383 · Cited by 90 · cited 2× · see citing works
“69 The TL has open and closed conformations, which are known to be important for the nucleotide 70 addition (10-13).”
BackgroundGeng, C., Vangone, A., Folkers, G. E., Xue, L. C., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2019) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25630 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Dutagaci, B., Duan, B., Qiu, C., Kaplan, C. D., & Feig, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Merced (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dutagaci, Bercem
- Feig, Michael
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2023-03-22
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e1010999
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC10069792
- OpenAlex
- W4353016412
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2023-04-03)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM126948, R01 GM097260, R35 GM14116)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- RNA polymerase II, trigger loop, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, amino acid mutations, transcriptional fidelity, loss-of-function mutations, gain-of-function mutations, lethal mutations, bridge helix, hydrophobic interactions, variational autoencoder, protein conformational change
- MeSH terms
- Mutation, RNA Polymerase II, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription, Genetic, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review