SPIN-CGNN: Improved fixed backbone protein design with contact map-based graph construction and contact graph neural network
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved the ability to infer protein sequences directly from protein structures for the fix-backbone design. The methods have evolved from the early use of multi-layer perceptrons to convolutional neural networks, transformers, and graph neural networks (GNN). However, the conventional approach of constructing K-nearest-neighbors (KNN) graph for GNN has limited the utilization of edge information, which plays a critical role in network performance. Here we introduced SPIN-CGNN based on protein contact maps for nearest neighbors. Together with auxiliary edge updates and selective kernels, we found that SPIN-CGNN provided a comparable performance in refolding ability by AlphaFold2 to the current state-of-the-art techniques but a significant improvement over them in term of sequence recovery, perplexity, deviation from amino-acid compositions of native sequences, conservation of hydrophobic positions, and low complexity regions, according to the test by unseen structures, “hallucinated” structures and diffusion models. Results suggest that low complexity regions in the sequences designed by deep learning, for generated structures in particular, remain to be improved, when compared to the native sequences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.09.519842 · Cited by 2,369 · see citing works
De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · Cited by 2,325 · see citing works
Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.03.494563 · Cited by 2,107 · see citing works
Robust deep learning–based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add2187 · Cited by 2,070 · see citing works
Advances in protein structure prediction and design
Kuhlman, B., & Bradley, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0163-x · Cited by 806 · see citing works
De novo protein design by deep network hallucination
Anishchenko, I., Chidyausiku, T. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Pellock, S. J., & Baker, D. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.22.211482 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
End-to-End Differentiable Learning of Protein Structure
AlQuraishi, M. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.006 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Yin, H., Ling, F., Zhan, J., & Zhou, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shenzhen Bay Laboratory (CN)
- South China University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ling, Fei
- Zhan, Jian
- Zhou, Yaoqi
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2023-12-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1011330
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC10729952
- OpenAlex
- W4389429454
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2023-12-19)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (NO.2021YFF1200400)
- Major Program of Shenzhen Bay Laboratory (S201101001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein design, contact maps, graph neural networks, contact graphs, k-nearest neighbor graph, low complexity regions, diffusion models
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Diffusion, Cluster Analysis, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review